Predicting FDA approvability of small-molecule drugs
Huang, C.-H.; Hsu, J.; Yang, L.-y.; CHEN, T.-M.; Shih, E. S. C.; Hwang, M.-J.
Show abstract
A high rate of compound attrition makes drug discovery via conventional methods time-consuming and expensive. Here, we showed that machine learning models can be trained to classify compounds into distinctive groups according to their status in the drug development process, which can significantly reduce the compound attrition rate. Using molecular structure fingerprints and physicochemical properties as input, our models accurately predicted which drug compounds would proceed to trial, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.94 {+/-} 0.01 (mean {+/-} standard deviation). Our models also identified which drugs in clinical trials would be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to go on the market, with an AUC of 0.73 {+/-} 0.02. The predictive power of our models could reduce the attrition rate of preclinical compounds to enter clinical trials from 65%, as with conventional methods, to 12% (with 92% sensitivity) and the clinical trial failure rate from 80-90% to 29% (with 83% sensitivity). The results largely held in additional tests on new clinical trial compounds and new FDA-approved drugs, as well as on drugs uniquely approved for use in Europe and Japan. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe odds of developing a drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are slim, meaning that the vast majority of drug candidates would fail tests for safety and efficacy in the drug discovery process, rendering it highly inefficient and costly. Here, we have developed machine learning models to predict drug compounds worthy of clinical trials with high accuracy, and clinical-trial compounds to receive FDA approval with a much higher success rate than that achieved by the traditional approach. Our computational prediction requires input of only the drug compounds chemical structure and physicochemical properties. It can help mitigate the long-standing problem of drug discovery.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Ligand Design using Shared Latent Implicit Fingerprints from Collaborative Filtering 97%
- A Graph Convolutional Network-based screening strategy for rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 cell-entry inhibitors 96%
- A Simple Way to Incorporate Target Structural Information in Molecular Generative Models 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Merging Bioactivity Predictions from Cell Morphology and Chemical Fingerprint Models Using Similarity to Training Data 96%
- Comprehensive machine learning boosts structure-based virtual screening for PARP1 inhibitors 94%
- DrugDiff - small molecule diffusion model with flexible guidance towards molecular properties 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Repurposing Therapeutics for COVID-19: Rapid Prediction of Commercially available drugs through Machine Learning and Docking 95%
- Exploring NCATS In-House Biomedical Data for Evidence-based Drug Repurposing 95%
- Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.