Natural Variation in Brachypodium distachyon Responses to Combined Abiotic Stresses
Ludwig, E.; Polydore, S.; Berry, J.; Sumner, J.; Ficor, T.; Agnew, E.; Haines, K.; Greenham, K.; Fahlgren, N.; Mockler, T. C.; Gehan, M. A.
Show abstract
The growing world population increases demand for agricultural production, which is more challenging as climate change increases global temperature and causes more extreme weather events. High-throughput phenotyping tools can be used to measure plant responses to the environment to identify genomic regions associated with response to stress. This study examines the phenotypic variation of 149 accessions of Brachypodium distachyon under drought, heat, and the combination of both stresses. Heat alone causes the largest amounts of tissue damage and the combination of heat and drought causes the largest decrease in plant biomass compared to other treatments. Notably, Bd21-0, the reference line for B. distachyon, was identified as not having very robust growth under stress conditions, especially in the heat-drought combined treatment. Climate data from the collection locations of these accessions (climate of origin) was used to assess whether climate of origin was correlated with responses to stresses and it was found to be significantly associated with height and percent of plant tissue damage. Additionally, genome wide association mapping found a number of genetic loci associated with changes in plant height, biomass, and the amount of damaged tissue under stress. Some SNPs found to be significantly associated with a response to heat or drought are also significantly associated in the combination of stresses, while others are not, and some significantly associated SNPs were only identified in the combined stress treatment. This, combined with the phenotypic data, indicates that the effects of these abiotic stresses are not simply additive, and the responses of B. distachyon to the combined stresses differ from drought and heat alone. Significant SNPs were closely located to genes known to be involved in plant responses to abiotic stresses.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of genes associated with abiotic stress tolerance in sweetpotato using weighted gene co-expression network analysis 96%
- Metabolomic, photoprotective, and photosynthetic acclimatory responses to post-flowering drought in sorghum 95%
- Non-destructive, whole-plant phenotyping reveals dynamic changes in water use efficiency, photosynthesis efficiency, and rhizosphere acidification of sorghum accessions under osmotic stress 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput phenotyping reveals multiple drought responses of wild and cultivated Phaseolinae beans 97%
- Phenotypic Variation from Waterlogging in Multiple Perennial Ryegrass Varieties under Climate Change Conditions 96%
- Tolerance of combined drought and heat stress is associated with transpiration maintenance and water soluble carbohydrates in wheat grains 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genome-enabled growth models to study shoot growth responses to water deficit in rice Oryza sativa 97%
- High-throughput field phenotyping reveals that selection in breeding has affected the phenology and temperature response of wheat in the stem elongation phase 97%
- Linking phenology, harvest index and genetics to improve chickpea grain yield 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of PIF7 attenuates shade and elevated temperature responses throughout the lifecycle in Pennycress 96%
- Upregulation of C4 characteristics does not consistently improve photosynthetic performance in intraspecific hybrids of a grass 95%
- Genome-wide association study, network analysis, and reverse genetics pinpoint novel genes associated with seedling root growth variation of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.