Back

"This guideline is not practical; it might be practical to specialists like you": Doctors experiences of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline in Nigeria; A qualitative study.

Ozoh, O. B.; Dede, S. K.; Eze, J. N.; Mortimer, K.; Chinouya, M. J.

2022-10-17 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.10.14.22281114 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report sets out updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management. Little is known about how this report is perceived and implemented in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. We explored the experiences of asthma management as informed by the current GINA guideline among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria. MethodsUsing a qualitative research approach, in-depth interviews were conducted among doctors in Lagos, Nigeria to explore their experiences of asthma management in the context of the current GINA report. The thematic framework approach was used for data analysis. ResultsEleven doctors (five general practitioners (GPs) and six Family Physicians (FPs) took part. Four overarching themes were identified: O_LIKnowledge of, and attitude towards the GINA strategy: Whilst most doctors were aware of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content including current recommendations for mild asthma treatment. C_LIO_LIAsthma diagnosis and treatment: There was limited access to lung function testing facilities and its role in asthma diagnosis was underappreciated. C_LIO_LIBarriers to managing asthma according to GINA recommendations: These included complexity of the GINA report, unavailability and unaffordability of asthma medicines and poor patient adherence to medications, driven by socio-cultural factors. C_LIO_LIEnablers of GINA-recommended asthma management: Improvement in asthma education for doctors and the general population and better access to diagnostic tests and medicines. C_LI ConclusionWhilst there was awareness of the existence of the GINA report, there was limited knowledge about its content and several barriers to its implementation were reported. Education about the GINA report, investment in diagnostic and treatment services and simplification of recommendations were identified as possible solutions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
26
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%