Back

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the biofilm-degrading Pseudomonas phage Motto, as a candidate for phage therapy

Manohar, P.; Loh, B.; Turner, D.; Ramasamy, T.; Mathankumar, M.; Elangovan, N.; Nachimuthu, R.; Leptihn, S.

2022-10-13 microbiology
10.1101/2022.10.12.512010 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are becoming increasingly difficult to treat due to the emergence of strains that have acquired multidrug resistance. Therefore, phage therapy has gained attention as an alternative to the treatment of pseudomonal infections. Phages are not only bactericidal but occasionally show activity against biofilm as well. Here, we describe the Pseudomonas phage Motto which has the ability to clear P. aeruginosa infections in an animal model and also exhibited biofilm-degrading properties. The phage has substantial antibiofilm activity against strong biofilm-producing isolates (n = 10), with at least a 2-fold reduction within 24 hours. To demonstrate the safety of using phage Motto, we performed cytotoxicity studies with human cell lines (HEK 293 and RAW 264.7 macrophages). Using a previously established in vivo model, we demonstrated the efficacy of Motto in C. elegans, with a 90% survival rate when treated with the phage at an MOI of 10. ImportancePhages are often evaluated mainly on their ability to kill bacterial hosts. One important aspect, however, is often neglected: Their ability to degrade biofilms. Not all phages are able to disintegrate biofilms. While phages can kill planktonic cells, it also has often been observed that phages are not able to infect those that are embedded in biofilms. Phage Motto appears to have highly efficient enzymes that degrade biofilms, and might therefore be a highly valuable therapeutic candidate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.