Back

Real-time surveillance of international SARS-CoV-2 prevalence using systematic traveller arrival screening

Kucharski, A.; Chung, K.; Aubry, M.; Teiti, I.; Teissier, A.; Richard, V.; Russell, T.; Bos, R.; Olivier, S.; Cao-Lormeau, V.-M.

2022-10-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.10.12.22280928 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEffective COVID-19 response relies on good knowledge of infection dynamics, but owing to under-ascertainment and delays in symptom-based reporting, obtaining reliable infection data has typically required large dedicated local population studies. Although many countries implemented SARS-CoV-2 testing among travellers, interpretation of arrival testing data has typically been challenging because arrival testing data were rarely reported systematically, and pre-departure testing was often in place as well, leading to non-representative infection status among arrivals. MethodsIn French Polynesia, testing data were reported systematically with enforced pre-departure testing type and timing, making it possible to adjust for non-representative infection status among arrivals. Combining statistical models of PCR positivity with data on international travel protocols, we reconstructed estimates of prevalence at departure using only testing data from arrivals. We then applied this estimation approach to the USA and France, using data from over 220,000 tests from travellers arriving into French Polynesia between July 2020 and March 2022. FindingsWe estimated a peak infection prevalence at departure of 2.8% (2.3-3.6%) in France and 1.1% (0.81-3.1%) in the USA in late 2020/early 2021, with prevalence of 5.4% (4.8-6.1%) and 5.5% (4.6-6.6%) respectively estimated for the Omicron BA.1 waves in early 2022. We found that our infection estimates were a leading indicator of later reported case dynamics, as well as being consistent with subsequent observed changes in seroprevalence over time. InterpretationAs well as elucidating previously unmeasured infection dynamics in these countries, our analysis provides a proof-of-concept for scalable tracking of global infections during future pandemics. FundingWellcome (206250/Z/17/Z)

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.2%
2
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
16
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%