Background prostate tissue is quantitatively abnormal on MRI in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer
Conlin, C. C.; Karunamuni, R.; Hussain, T. S.; Zhong, A. Y.; Kallis, K.; Do, D. D.; Lui, A. J.; Mani, G.; Ollison, C.; Rojo Domingo, M.; Shabaik, A.; Kane, C. J.; Bagrodia, A.; McKay, R. R.; Kuperman, J. M.; Rakow-Penner, R.; Hahn, M. E.; Dale, A. M.; Seibert, T. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundT2-weighted MRI is standard for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by identifying visible lesions that stand out from the background prostate. PurposeTo determine whether patients with csPCa have abnormal T2-weighted signal in non-lesion, background prostate tissue (BP). MethodsThis retrospective study included two patient cohorts who underwent 3T MRI examination for suspected csPCa. Median (urine-normalized) T2-weighted signal was computed for BP and compared between patients with and without csPCa. csPCa discrimination performance of T2-weighted BP signal was evaluated using area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). T2 and S0 (a proxy for proton density) were computed and compared between patients with and without csPCa. T2 was also recomputed using larger buffers around csPCa lesions. csPCa discrimination performance was compared between two predictors: Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) C1 and RSI C1 normalized by global prostate median T2-weighted signal. ResultsCohort 1: 46 patients (age: 64{+/-}10 years). Cohort 2: 151 patients (65{+/-}8 years). Urine-normalized T2-weighted signal was systematically lower in BP of subjects with csPCa (p[≤]0.034) and indicated the presence of cancer (cohort 1: AUC=0.80; cohort 2: AUC=0.68). BP T2 was significantly lower in csPCa patients (p[≤]0.011), while S0 was not (p[≥]0.30). BP T2 measurements were stable to within 5% with buffers from 0 to 30 mm around visible lesions. csPCa discrimination improved with incorporation of BP T2-weighted signal (cohort 1: AUC=0.72 for RSI C1 alone, versus 0.81 with BP T2-weighted signal; cohort 2: AUC=0.63 versus 0.76). ConclusionLower T2-weighted signal in BP suggests the presence of csPCa.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Locally-invasive, castrate-resistant prostate cancer in a Pten/Trp53 double knockout mouse model of prostate cancer monitored with non-invasive bioluminescent imaging 92%
- Manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI) in breast and prostate cancers: exploring the potential role of calcium receptors. 92%
- An immunohistochemical prostate cell identification key indicates that aging shifts procollagen 1A1 production from myofibroblasts to fibroblasts in dogs prone to prostate-related urinary dysfunction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of HOXB13 expression in neuroendocrine prostate cancer 90%
- Correcting B0 inhomogeneity-induced distortions in whole-body diffusion MRI of bone metastases 89%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Spatial Profiling identifies phospho-JNK as a biomarker for early risk stratification of aggressive prostate cancer 91%
- Ultrastructural analysis of prostate cancer tissue provides insights into androgen-dependent adaptations to membrane contact site establishment 90%
- Association of the rs1042522 SNP with prostate cancer risk: a study of cancer tissues, primary tumor cultures and serum samples from a European Caucasian population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association Between Artificial Intelligence-Derived Tumor Volume and Oncologic Outcomes for Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation Therapy 93%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 88%
- Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer and perceived barriers toward its implementation: a survey 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.