Prediction and location of malignant nodules and microcalcifications in mammography via Deep Learning
Coronado-Gutierrez, D.; Franco, P.; Lopez, C.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo propose a tool to detect and locate malignant nodules and microcalcifications in mammography and judge its potential as a screening tool. MethodsIn this institutional review board approved retrospective study we presented a new tool based on deep learning techniques to predict and locate lesions in mammograms, called quantusMM. 3,114 mammograms from 976 patients were collected from Onkologikoa (Instituto Oncologico de Kutxa) databases for this purpose: 1,248 images with malignant nodules, 736 with malignant microcalcifications and 1,131 without any suspicious findings. The proposed methods split the images in patches to be able to locate the lesions in the image. Then, these methods select the patches most likely to have a lesion based on the brightness values of the pixels. 80% of the selected patches (with the corresponding outcome) were used to train deep learning algorithms and the remaining 20% were used to test the performance to classify into malignant parts or control parts. ResultsThe proposed methods obtain an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 95.5% to predict malignant nodules using the patches, and 90.4% to predict malignant nodules into the whole images. To predict malignant microcalcifications the method obtains an AUC of 99.0% into patches and 90.0% into the whole images. ConclusionsThe proposed tool shows potential to predict and locate malignant nodules and microcalcification lesions in mammography. This new approach could help in the first screening of patients and also could greatly benefit radiologists to support decision making.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 97%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 94%
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- piNET: An Automated Proliferation Index Calculator Framework for Ki67 Breast Cancer Images 96%
- Breast invasive ductal carcinoma classification on whole slide images with weakly-supervised and transfer learning 96%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment 95%
- Automated detection of the HER2 gene amplification status in Fluorescence in situ hybridization images for the diagnostics of cancer tissues 94%
- Estimation of Three-Dimensional Chromatin Morphology for Nuclear Classification and Characterisation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 95%
- Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics 93%
- Deep learning ensemble for abdominal aortic calcification scoring from lumbar spine X-ray and DXA images 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.