Highly contiguous genome assemblies of Photobacterium strains isolatedfrom fish light organs using nanopore sequencing technology
Gould, A.; Henderson, J.
Show abstract
Several species of luminous bacteria in the genus Photobacterium are the light organ symbionts of teleost fishes. Photobacterium leiognathi and its subspecies, P. mandapamensis, in particular, commonly form bioluminescent symbioses with fish hosts in the Leiognathidae and Acropomatidae families as well as with cardinalfish in the genus Siphamia (Apogonidae). These two closely related lineages of Photobacterium are right at the cutoff average nucleotide identity used to delimit bacterial species (95-96%) and show overlapping ecological niches, including their host fish range. However, there are only a few whole genome assemblies available for these bacterial species, particularly for symbiotic strains isolated from fish light organs, that can be used to explore genome evolution of these two lineages. Here we used Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing to produce long reads for assembling highly contiguous genomes of Photobacterium strains isolated from fish light organs, including several P. kishitanii strains isolated from deep water fishes. We were able to assemble 31 high-quality genomes with near complete BUSCO scores, many at the chromosome-level, and compare their gene contents, including plasmid genes. In doing so, we discovered a new candidate species of Photobacterium, Candidatus Photobacterium acropomis, which originated from the light organ of the acropomid fish, Acropoma japonicum. We also describe a lack of congruency between the presence of the luxF gene, which is involved in light production, and the phylogenetic relationships between closely related P. leiognathi and P. mandapamensis strains. In contrast, there was strong congruency between luxF and the host fish family of origin, suggesting this gene might be essential to initiate bioluminescent symbioses with certain hosts, including Siphamia and Acropoma species. Our study shows the benefit of using long reads in the assembly of bacterial genomes and outlines an assembly pipeline that results in highly contiguous genomes, even from low-coverage ONT reads.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Draft Genome Sequences of Seven Strains of Dickeya dadantii, a Quick Decline-causing Pathogen in Fruit Trees, Isolated from Japan 91%
- A genome-annotated bacterial collection of the barley rhizosphere microbiota 91%
- Draft Genome Sequences of Nine Japanese Strains of the Kiwifruit Bacterial Canker Pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Biovar 3 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and Evolutionary analysis of Photosynthetic Gene Clusters on Extrachromosomal Replicons: from streamlined plasmids to chromids 95%
- Dynamic but constrained: Repeated acquisitions of nutritional symbionts in bed bugs (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) from a narrow taxonomic pool. 94%
- Metagenomic sequencing for rapid identification of Xylella fastidiosa from leaf samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust genome-based delineation of bacterial genera 93%
- Insights from single-strain and mixed culture experiments on the effects of heatwaves on freshwater flagellates 93%
- Assessment by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption - Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry of the Diversity of Endophytes and Rhizobacteria Cultured from the Maize Microbiome 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative genomics of Nocardia seriolae reveals recent importation and subsequent widespread dissemination in mariculture farms in South Central Coast, Vietnam 96%
- Evidence of a novel sublineage of Streptococcus agalactiae in elephants from zoo populations in Germany 94%
- Genomic Insights into the Diversity, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Zoonotic Potential of Campylobacter fetus Across Diverse Hosts and Geographies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.