Development and validation of a type 2 diabetes machine learning classification model for clinical decision support framework
Glanz, V.; Dudenkov, V.; Velikorodny, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundUndiagnosed type 2 diabetes continues to represent a significant challenge for all national healthcare systems. Although diagnostic criteria and laboratory screening procedures are well-established, clinical tests have limitations, and in many cases, diagnosis confirmation and more accurate interpretation of the test results are required. Machine learning methods, when applied to clinical outcome risk prediction, demonstrate great effectiveness, as they recognize specific patterns in data dynamics and thus can be used for the identification of at-risk cases where diabetes and complications can be delayed or even prevented. The aim of this study was to develop a type 2 diabetes machine learning model capable of efficient early identification of diabetes presence based on the results of common laboratory tests. MethodsReal-world medical data from electronic medical records were subjected to a multistage processing, including feature selection, missing values imputation. The machine learning algorithms adopted in this study were XGBoost, multilayer perceptron, ridge classifier, ridge classifier with polynomial features, bootstrap aggregating, dynamic ensemble selection, stacked generalization. An external dataset was analyzed via the same workflow to validate the initial results. The study was designed in accordance with the TRIPOD statement. ResultsWe have developed a machine learning classification model for type 2 diabetes that possesses several important advantages over conventional clinical methods (specifically, FINDRISC, ADA risk score). Performance metrics for the diabetes diagnostic model were 0.96 AUC, 92% specificity, and 89% sensitivity (mean values). ConclusionsThe study results potentially have major clinical implication and provide a contribution to the field of conventional diabetes risk assessment tools. Being specifically trained on real-world laboratory data and based on satisfactory external validation results, the present diagnostic type 2 diabetes model demonstrates high generalizability and can serve as a medical decision support and health monitoring tool.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 97%
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 96%
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 96%
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements 96%
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A new machine learning method for cancer mutation analysis 94%
- Deep learning approach for automatic assessment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in patients using R-R intervals 93%
- GCNCDA: A New Method for Predicting CircRNA-Disease Associations Based on Graph Convolutional Network Algorithm 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.