A Hybrid Learning Method with High Specificity for Excluding Non-chromosome Objects Problem
Wu, J.; Kao, E.-F.; Hsieh, Y.-J.; Ke, C.-C.; Lin, W.-C.; Ou Yang, F.-Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundFor automated analysis of metaphase chromosome images, the chromosome objects on the images need to be segmented in advance. However, the segmentation results often contain a lot of non-chromosome objects in the images. Hence, elimination of non-chromosome objects is an essential process in automated chromosome image analysis. This study aims to exclude non-chromosome objects and preserve as many chromosomes as possible. In this paper, we propose a hybrid deep learning method to exclude non-chromosome objects from metaphase chromosome images. MethodThe proposed method consists of two phases. In the first phase, two classification results are obtained from feature-based and image-based convolutional neural networks (CNN) separately (the feature-based CNN uses the features of the images as input; the image-based CNN uses the images as input directly). In the second phase, the prediction results from the above two CNNs are combined and resent to another CNN to obtain final classification results. ResultsThe proposed method uses 18,757 non-chromosome objects and 43,398 chromosomes (including single and multiple overlapped chromosomes) from 1038 chromosome images to evaluate the performance. The experimental results show that the proposed method can detect and exclude 99.61% (18,683/18,757) of the non-chromosome objects and preserve 99.95% (43,375/43,398) of the chromosomes for further analysis. ConclusionsThe proposed method has a high effectiveness on excluding non-chromosome objects and could be used as a preprocessing procedure for chromosome image analysis. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=95 SRC="FIGDIR/small/511091v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1183f1forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d84d69org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c23122org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@127e4e9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphic AbstractC_FLOATNO C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Model of Microscopic Agglutination Test for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis 98%
- PathEX: Make Good Choice for Whole Slide Image Extraction 97%
- An overview of GabRat edge disruption and its new extensions for unbiased quantification of disruptive camouflaging patterns using randomization technique 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of Three-Dimensional Chromatin Morphology for Nuclear Classification and Characterisation 97%
- A Robust Spike Sorting Method based on the Joint Optimization of Linear Discrimination Analysis and Density Peaks 95%
- A hybrid CNN-Random Forest algorithm for bacterial spore segmentation and classification in TEM images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling and Visualization of Rice Root Based on Morphological Parameters 96%
- SN-FPN: Self-attention Nested Feature Pyramid Network for Digital Pathology Image Segmentation 95%
- Accurate detection of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in optical coherence tomography images using convolutional neural networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Local Mean Suppression Filter for Effective Background Identification in Fluorescence Images 95%
- The mathematics of erythema: Development of machine learning models for artificial intelligence assisted measurement and severity scoring of radiation induced dermatitis 93%
- Decoding Clinical Biomarker Space of COVID-19: Exploring Matrix Factorization-based Feature Selection Methods 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.