Back

Natural variation in Arabidopsis responses to Plasmodiophora brassicae reveals an essential role for RPB1

Ochoa, J. C.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Bieluszewski, T.; Jedryczka, M.; Malinowski, R.; Truman, W.

2022-10-07 plant biology
10.1101/2022.10.06.511079 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the identification of clubroot resistance genes in various Brassica crops our understanding of the genetic basis of immunity to Plasmodiophora brassicae infection in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana remains limited. To address this issue we performed a screen of 142 natural accessions and identified 11 clubroot resistant Arabidopsis lines. Genome wide association analysis identified several genetic loci significantly linked with resistance. Three genes from two of these loci were targeted for deletion by CRISPR/Cas9 mutation in resistant accessions Est-1 and Uod-1. Deletion of Resistance to Plasmodiophora brassicae 1 (RPB1) rendered both lines susceptible to the P. brassicae pathotype P1+. Further analysis of rpb1 knock-out Est-1 and Uod-1 lines showed that the RPB1 protein is required for activation of downstream defence responses, such as the expression of phytoalexin biosynthesis gene CYP71A13. RPB1 has no known functional domains or homology to previously characterised proteins. The clubroot susceptible Arabidopsis accession Col-0 lacks a functional RPB1 gene; when Col-0 is transformed with RPB1 expression driven by its native promoter it is capable of activating RPB1 expression in response to infection but this is not sufficient to confer resistance. Constitutive over-expression of RPB1 in Col-0 leads to drastically reduced growth and activation of stress-responsive genes. Furthermore, we found that transient expression of RPB1 in Nicotiana tabacum induced programmed cell death in leaves. We conclude that RPB1 is a critical component of the defence response to P. brassicae infection in Arabidopsis, acting downstream of pathogen recognition but required for the elaboration of effective resistance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.