Back

Pseudomonas apudapuas sp. nov., Pseudomonas fontis sp. nov., Pseudomonas idahonensis sp. nov., and Pseudomonas rubra sp. nov. isolated from in, and around, a rainbow trout farm

Testerman, T.; Varga, J.; Donohue, H.; Vieira Da Silva, C.; Graf, J.

2022-10-04 microbiology
10.1101/2022.10.04.510816 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During a large-scale bacterial culturing effort of biofilms in the vicinity of a rainbow trout aquaculture facility in Idaho, USA, ten isolates were identified as having pathogen inhibiting activity and were characterized further. These isolates were shown to be Gram negative, rod-shaped bacteria belonging to the genus Pseudomonas. Whole genome comparisons and multi-locus sequence analysis using four housekeeping genes (16S rDNA, gyrA, rpoB, rpoD) showed that these 10 isolates clustered into four distinct species groups. These comparisons also indicated that these isolates were below the established species cutoffs for the genus Pseudomonas. Further phenotypic characterization using API 20NE, API ZYM, and BioLog GENIII assays and chemotaxonomic analysis of cellular fatty acids were carried out. Based on the genomic, physiological, and chemotaxonomic properties of these isolates, we concluded that these strains composed four novel species of Pseudomonas. The proposed names are: Pseudomonas apudapuas sp. nov. consisting of strains ID233, ID386T, and ID387 with ID386T (DSM 114641) as the type strain; Pseudomonas rubra sp. nov. consisting of strains ID291T, ID609, and ID1025 with ID291T (DSM 114640) as the type strain; Pseudomonas idahonensis sp. nov. consisting of strains ID357T and ID1048 with ID357T (DSM 114609) as the type strain; and Pseudomonas fontis sp. nov. consisting of strains ID656T and ID681 with ID656T (DSM 114610) as the type strain.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.