Back

Using Deep Learning to Determine Amyloid Deposition through PET and Clinical Data for Alzheimer's Prognosis

Maddury, S. M.; Desai, K. S.

2022-10-05 neurology
10.1101/2022.10.04.22280712 medRxiv
Show abstract

Amyloid deposition is a vital biomarker in the process of Alzheimers diagnosis. Florbetapir PET scans can provide valuable imaging data to determine cortical amyloid quantities. However the process is labor and doctor intensive, requiring extremely specialized education and resources that may not be accessible to everyone, making the amyloid calculation process inefficient. Deep learning is a rising tool in Alzheimers research which could be used to determine amyloid deposition. Using data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified 2980 patients with PET imaging, clinical, and genetic data. We tested various ResNet and EfficientNet convolutional neural networks and later combined them with Gradient Boosting Decision Tree algorithms to predict standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of amyloid in each patient session. We tried several configurations to find the best model tuning for regression-to-SUVR. We found that the EfficientNetV2-Small architecture combined with a grid search-tuned Gradient Boosting Decision Tree with 3 axial input slices and clinical and genetic data achieved the lowest loss. Using the mean-absolute-error metric, the loss converged to an MAE of 0.0466, equating to 96.11% accuracy across the 596 patient test set. We showed that this method is more consistent and accessible in comparison to human readers from previous studies, with lower margins of error and substantially faster calculation times. Deep learning algorithms could be used in hospitals and clinics with resource limitations for amyloid deposition, and shows promise for more imaging tasks as well.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.