Back

Nicotine Modifies Responding for Cocaine in a Concurrent Rodent Self-administration Model

Dawes, M. H.; Estave, P. M.; Albertson, S. E.; Holleran, K. M.; Jones, S. R.

2022-10-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.30.510390 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prevailing preclinical models of cocaine use have not resulted in an FDA-approved treatment for cocaine use disorder, potentially due to a focus on cocaine use in isolation, which may not translate well to polysubstance use in clinical populations. Clinically, nicotine has been shown to increase cocaines potency and reinforcing efficacy, but some preclinical studies suggest that non-contingent nicotine exposure is not sufficient to alter cocaine self-administration in rats; therefore, this experiment examined if the addition of nicotine to the cocaine solution would alter self-administration behavior. Male Sprague Dawley rats (N=7) were trained to self-administer cocaine (0.75mg/kg/inf), and tested on a long access, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement (6 hour sessions, unlimited inf, 5 days), for cocaine alone (0.75mg/kg/inf), followed by cocaine and nicotine (0.75mg/kg/inf cocaine+0.03mg/kg/inf nicotine). Finally, rats responded on a progressive ratio schedule for varied doses of cocaine with and without concurrent nicotine at a consistent dose (1.5, 0.75, 0.375, 0.19mg/kg/inf cocaine{+/-} 0.03mg/kg/inf nicotine). Unexpectedly, under long access conditions, rats self-administering cocaine and nicotine responded less than for cocaine alone, and did not escalate responding. However, under progressive ratio conditions, responding for cocaine and nicotine was greater than responding for cocaine alone across low and moderate cocaine doses, and decreased at high cocaine doses, indicating a leftward shift in the dose response curve. Together, these data highlight the importance of evaluating multiple outcome measures in nicotine + cocaine paradigms, and suggest that concurrent self-administration of cocaine and nicotine results in greater motivated responding than for cocaine alone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
7
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
8
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%