Back

Task-based attentional and default mode connectivity associated with STEM anxiety profiles among university physics students

Smith, D. D.; Meca, A.; Bottenhorn, K. L.; Bartley, J. E.; Riedel, M. C.; Salo, T.; Peraza, J. A.; Laird, R. W.; Pruden, S. M.; Sutherland, M. T.; Brewe, E.; Laird, A. R.

2022-10-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.09.30.508557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Attentional control theory (ACT) posits that elevated anxiety increases the probability of re-allocating cognitive resources needed to complete a task to processing anxiety-related stimuli. This process impairs processing efficiency and can lead to reduced performance effectiveness. Science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) students frequently experience STEM-related anxiety, which can interfere with learning and performance and negatively impact student retention and graduation rates. The objective of this study was to extend the ACT framework to investigate the neurobiological associations between STEM-related anxiety and cognitive performance among 123 physics undergraduate students. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified four profiles of student STEM-related anxiety, including two profiles that represented the majority of the sample (Low STEM Anxiety; 59.3% and High Math Anxiety; 21.9%) and two additional profiles that were not well represented (High STEM Anxiety; 6.5% and High Science Anxiety; 4.1%). Students underwent a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session in which they performed two tasks involving physics cognition: the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) task and the Physics Knowledge (PK) task. No significant differences were observed in FCI or PK task performance between High Math Anxiety and Low STEM Anxiety students. During the three phases of the FCI task, we found no significant brain connectivity differences during scenario and question presentation, yet we observed significant differences during answer selection within and between the dorsal attention network (DAN), ventral attention network (VAN), and default mode network (DMN). Further, we found significant group differences during the PK task were limited to the DAN, including DAN-VAN and within-DAN connectivity. These results highlight the different cognitive processes required for physics conceptual reasoning compared to physics knowledge retrieval, provide new insight into the underlying brain dynamics associated with anxiety and physics cognition, and confirm the relevance of ACT theory for STEM-related anxiety.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
2
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
3
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
6
International Journal of Psychophysiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
14
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
16
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
18
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
19
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
20
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
21
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
22
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
23
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
24
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
25
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
26
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
28
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
29
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%