Ethnic inequities in the patterns of Personalised Care Adjustments for Informed Dissent and Patient Unsuitable: A retrospective study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Hayanga, B.; Stafford, M.; Ashworth, M.; Hughes, J.; Becares, L.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo examine patterns of PCA reporting for informed dissent and patient unsuitable, how they vary by ethnic group, and whether ethnic inequities can be explained by socio-demographic factors or comorbidities. DesignA retrospective study using routinely collected electronic health records. SettingIndividual patient data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink collected from UK general practice. ParticipantsPatients with at least one of the 12 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) conditions which had PCA coding options from a random sample of 690,00 patients aged 18+ years on the 1st of Jan 2016. Main outcomes measuresThe associations between ethnicity and two PCA reasons ( Informed Dissent and Patient Unsuitable) were examined using logistic regressions after adjustment for age, sex, multiple QOF conditions and area-level deprivation. ResultsThe association between ethnicity and the two PCA reasons were in opposite directions. After accounting for age, gender, multiple QOF conditions and area-level deprivation, people of Bangladeshi [OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.87], Black African [OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.81], Black Caribbean, OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.76], Indian [OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.83], mixed [OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.99], other Asian [OR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.86] and other ethnicity [OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.80] were less likely to have a PCA record for informed dissent than people of white ethnicity. Only people of Indian ethnicity were significantly less likely than people of white ethnicity to have a PCA record for patient unsuitable in fully adjusted models [OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.94]. We found ethnic inequities in PCA reporting for patient unsuitable among people of Black Caribbean, Black other, Pakistani, and other ethnicity, but these attenuated after adjusting for multiple QOF conditions and/or area level deprivation. ConclusionStudy findings counter the narratives that suggest that people from minoritised ethnic groups often refuse medical intervention. They illuminate the complex relationship between informed dissent and (dis)empowerment which requires further scrutiny. They also show ethnic inequalities in PCA reporting for patient unsuitable that are linked to clinical and social complexity and should be tackled to improve health outcomes for all.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 93%
- Suspected COVID-19 in primary care: how GP records contribute to understanding differences in prevalence by ethnicity. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The risk of COVID hospital admission and COVID mortality during the first COVID 19 wave with a special emphasis on Ethnic Minorities: an observational study of a single, deprived, multi ethnic UK health economy 95%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 95%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 94%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 95%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 93%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- Understanding the clinical characteristics and timeliness of diagnosis for patients diagnosed with Long COVID: A retrospective observational cohort study from North West London 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.