Sex Difference in Causes and Timing of One-Year Outcomes Among Young Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients; Results from the VIRGO Study
Sawano, M.; Lu, Y.; Caraballo, C.; Mahajan, S.; Dreyer, R. P.; Lichtman, J.; D'Onofrio, G.; Spatz, E. S.; Khera, R.; Onuma, O.; Murugiah, K.; Spertus, J. A.; Krumholz, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundYounger women have higher recurrent hospitalization rates and worse health status than men after their index episode of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, whether women have a higher risk of cardiovascular events in the year after discharge is unknown. MethodsWe used data from the VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) study, which enrolled young AMI patients aged 18 to 55 years across 103 US hospitals. Sex differences in all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations were compared by calculating incidence rates (IR, per 1,000 person-years) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We then performed sequential modeling to evaluate the sex difference by calculating sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHR) accounting for deaths. ResultsAmong 2,007 women and 972 men, at least one all-cause hospitalization occurred among 905 (30.4%) participants in the year after discharge. The leading causes of hospitalization were MI-related (IR 171.8, 95% CI, 153.6-192.2 among women vs. IR 117.8, 95% CI, 97.3-142.6 among men), followed by non-cardiac (IR 145.8, 95% CI, 129.2-164.5 among women vs. IR 69.6, 95% CI, 54.5-88.9 among men) and other cardiac or stroke hospitalizations (IR 58.8, 95% CI, 48.8-70.7 among women vs. IR 53.8, 95% CI, 40.8-71.0 among men). Competing risk analysis showed that the sex difference was present for MI-related hospitalizations (SHR 1.33, 95%CI 1.04-1.70; P=0.02) and non-cardiac hospitalizations (SHR 1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.07; P=0.01). ConclusionsYoung women with AMI have more adverse outcomes compared with men in the year after discharge. MI-related hospitalizations were the most common cause of hospitalizations, but non-cardiac hospitalizations showed the most significant sex disparity. Further studies to better understand the underlying mechanisms of non-cardiac hospitalizations are warranted.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 96%
- Influence of Sex and Race/ Ethnicity on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Large Integrated Healthcare System 96%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in age, sex and racial differences in the incidence of infective endocarditis in Florida and New York 94%
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 93%
- Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment for Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial distress and health status as risk factors for ten-year major adverse cardiac events and mortality in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease 95%
- Impact of Anemia on Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A National Database Analysis 95%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019) 94%
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 93%
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.