Back

Contrast-free Super-resolution Doppler (CS Doppler) based on Deep Generative Neural Networks

You, Q.; Lowerison, M.; Shin, Y.; Chen, X.; Chandra Sekaran, N. V.; Dong, Z.; Llano, D. A.; Anastasio, M. A.; Song, P.

2022-10-02 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.09.29.510188 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Super-resolution ultrasound microvessel imaging based on ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) is an emerging imaging modality that is capable of resolving micron-scaled vessels deep into tissue. In practice, ULM is limited by the need for contrast injection, long data acquisition, and computationally expensive post-processing times. In this study, we present a contrast-free super-resolution Doppler (CS Doppler) technique that uses deep generative networks to achieve super-resolution with short data acquisition. The training dataset is comprised of spatiotemporal ultrafast ultrasound signals acquired from in vivo mouse brains, while the testing dataset includes in vivo mouse brain, chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), and healthy human subjects. The in vivo mouse imaging studies demonstrate that CS Doppler could achieve an approximate 2-fold improvement in spatial resolution when compared with conventional power Doppler. In addition, the microvascular images generated by CS Doppler showed good agreement with the corresponding ULM images as indicated by a structural similarity index of 0.7837 and a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 25.52. Moreover, CS Doppler was able to preserve the temporal profile of the blood flow (e.g., pulsatility) that is similar to conventional power Doppler. Finally, the generalizability of CS Doppler was demonstrated on testing data of different tissues using different imaging settings. The fast inference time of the proposed deep generative network also allows CS Doppler to be implemented for real-time imaging. These features of CS Doppler offer a practical, fast, and robust microvascular imaging solution for many preclinical and clinical applications of Doppler ultrasound.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
4
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
7
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
18
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
22
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%