Inference of differential gene regulatory networks from gene expression data using boosted differential trees
Galindez, G. G.; List, M.; Baumbach, J.; Blumenthal, D. B.; Kacprowski, T.
Show abstract
Diseases can be caused by molecular perturbations that induce specific changes in regulatory interactions and their coordinated expression, also referred to as network rewiring. However, the detection of complex changes in regulatory connections remains a challenging task and would benefit from the development of novel non-parametric approaches. We developed a new ensemble method called BoostDiff (boosted differential regression trees) to infer a differential network discriminating between two conditions. BoostDiff builds an adaptively boosted (AdaBoost) ensemble of differential trees with respect to a target condition. To build the differential trees, we propose differential variance improvement as a novel splitting criterion. Variable importance measures derived from the resulting models are used to reflect changes in gene expression predictability and to build the output differential networks. BoostDiff outperforms existing differential network methods on simulated data evaluated in two different complexity settings. We then demonstrate the power of our approach when applied to real transcriptomics data in COVID-19 and Crohns disease. BoostDiff identifies context-specific networks that are enriched with genes of known disease-relevant pathways and complements standard differential expression analyses. BoostDiff is available at https://github.com/gihannagalindez/boostdiff_inference. Author SummaryGene regulatory networks, which comprise the collection of regulatory relationships between transcription factors and their target genes, are important for controlling various molecular processes. Diseases can induce perturbations in normal gene co-expression patterns in these networks. Detecting differentially co-expressed or rewired edges between disease and healthy biological states can be thus useful for investigating the link between specific disease-associated molecular alterations and phenotype. We developed BoostDiff (boosted differential trees), an ensemble method to derive differential networks between two biological contexts. Our approach applies a boosting scheme using differential trees as base learner. A differential tree is a new tree structure that is built from two expression datasets using a splitting criterion called the differential variance improvement. The resulting BoostDiff model learns the most differentially predictive features which are then used to build the directed differential networks. BoostDiff outperforms other differential network methods on simulated data and outputs more biologically meaningful results when evaluated on real transcriptomics datasets. BoostDiff can be applied to gene expression data to reveal new disease mechanisms or identify potential therapeutic targets.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Generalized Higher-order Correlation Analysis Framework for Multi-Omics Network Inference 96%
- GeneCOCOA: Detecting context-specific functions of individual genes using co-expression data 96%
- HELP: A computational framework for labelling and predicting human common and context-specific essential genes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeltaNeTS+: Elucidating the mechanism of drugs and diseases using gene expression and transcriptional regulatory networks 97%
- GEOlimma: Differential Expression Analysis and Feature Selection Using Pre-Existing Microarray Data 96%
- SUBATOMIC: a SUbgraph BAsed mulTi-OMIcs Clustering framework to analyze integrated multi-edge networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CoRegNet: Unraveling Gene Co-regulation Networks from Public RNA-Seq Repositories Using a Beta-Binomial Statistical Model 96%
- Molecular Group and Correlation Guided Structural Learning for Multi-Phenotype Prediction 95%
- Comprehensive evaluation of methods for differential expression analysis of metatranscriptomics data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.