Back

Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized with Moderate or Severe Covid-19

O'Halloran, J.; Kedar, E.; Anstrom, K. J.; McCarthy, M. W.; Ko, E. R.; Segura Nunez, P.; Boucher, C.; Smith, P. B.; Panettieri, R. A.; Mendivil Tuchia de Tai, S.; Maillo, M.; Khan, A.; Mena Lora, A. J.; Salathe, M.; Capo, G.; Rodriguez Gonzalez, D.; Patterson, T. F.; Palma, C.; Ariza, H.; Patelli Lima, M.; Lachiewicz, A. M.; Blamoun, J.; Nannini, E.; Sprinz, E.; Mykietiuk, A.; Alicic, R.; Rauseo, A. M.; Wolfe, C. R.; Wittig, B.; Benjamin, D. K.; McNulty, S. E.; Zakroysky, P.; Halabi, S.; Butler, S.; Atkinson, J.; Adam, S. J.; Melsheimer, R.; Chang, S.; LaVange, L.; Proschan, M.; Bozzette, S. A

2022-09-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.09.22.22280245 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmune dysregulation contributes to poorer outcomes in severe Covid-19. Immunomodulators targeting various pathways have improved outcomes. We investigated whether infliximab provides benefit over standard of care. MethodsWe conducted a master protocol investigating immunomodulators for potential benefit in treatment of participants hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia. We report results for infliximab (single dose infusion) versus shared placebo both with standard of care. Primary outcome was time to recovery by day 29 (28 days after randomization). Key secondary endpoints included 14-day clinical status and 28-day mortality. ResultsA total of 1033 participants received study drug (517 infliximab, 516 placebo). Mean age was 54.8 years, 60.3% were male, 48.6% Hispanic or Latino, and 14% Black. No statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint was seen with infliximab compared with placebo (recovery rate ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29; p=0.063). Median (IQR) time to recovery was 8 days (7, 9) for infliximab and 9 days (8, 10) for placebo. Participants assigned to infliximab were more likely to have an improved clinical status at day 14 (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.66). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 10.1% with infliximab versus 14.5% with placebo, with 41% lower odds of dying in those receiving infliximab (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90). No differences in risk of serious adverse events including secondary infections. ConclusionsInfliximab did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in time to recovery. It was associated with improved 14-day clinical status and substantial reduction in 28- day mortality compared with standard of care. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04593940).

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
6
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
8
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
9
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
19
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%