Comparing Narrative Storytelling Ability in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
Pham, L.; Lee, A. K.; Estes, A.; Dager, S.; (Astley) Hemingway, S.; Thorne, J.; Lau, B. K.
Show abstract
PurposeNarrative discourse, or storytelling, is used in daily conversational interaction and reveals higher level language skills that may not be well captured by standardized assessments of language. Many individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) show difficulty with pragmatic language skills and narrative production offers one method of assessing expressive and pragmatic language skills in an ecologically relevant manner. This study investigated narrative abilities on both local and global levels of adolescent/young adults with ASD and FASD, and their age- and sex-matched comparison group. MethodNarratives from forty-five adolescents/young adults, 11 with ASD, 11 with FASD, 23 age- and sex-matched neurotypical comparison group, were elicited using a wordless storybook. They were then transcribed orthographically, formatted to the Systematic Analyses of Language Transcript (SALT) convention, and scored based on the narrative scoring scheme (NSS). Additional analyses investigated local language measures such as the number of mental state and temporal relation terms produced, as well as global language measures including the mean length of utterance, total number of different words, total number of words, total number of utterances, rate of speech, and the narrative scoring scheme total score. ResultsOn local language measures, no significant group differences were found. On global language measures, many aspects of narrative production in the ASD and FASD groups were comparable to each other and to the comparison group, although important differences were observed for the total number of words produced and rate of speech. ConclusionsGiven significant variability observed within groups, these findings suggest that language abilities should be assessed at an individual level. Future research should also consider additional variables that influence narrative production such as motivation, distractibility, or decision-making of individual subjects.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Combinatorial language parent-report score differs significantly between typically developing children and those with Autism Spectrum Disorders 98%
- The Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism (BOSA): Development of a New Adapted Assessment Measure for Remote Telehealth Administration through COVID-19 and Beyond 96%
- Theory of Mind and Moral Decision-Making in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence and developmental course of auditory processing differences in autistic children 97%
- Individuals with autism have no detectable deficit in neural markers of prediction error when presented with auditory rhythms of varied temporal complexity 95%
- Idiosyncratic pupil regulation in autistic children 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Features for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Children using Machine Learning 94%
- Motor and non-motor sequence prediction is equally affected in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder 93%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.