Back

Multicentre comparison of biological and functional properties of mesenchymal stromal cells from different sources cultivated using a harmonised manufacturing workflow

Calcat-i-Cervera, S.; Rendra, E.; Scaccia, E.; Amadeo, F.; Hanson, V.; Wilm, B.; Murray, P.; O'Brien, T.; Taylor, A.; Bieback, K.

2022-09-16 cell biology
10.1101/2022.09.14.507944 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), commonly sourced from adipose tissue, bone marrow and umbilical cord, have been widely used in many medical conditions due to their therapeutic potential. Yet, the still limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action hampers clinical translation. Clinical potency can vary considerably depending on tissue source, donor attributes, but importantly, also culture conditions. Lack of standard procedures hinders inter-study comparability and delays the progression of the field. The aim of this study was A-to assess the impact on MSC characteristics when different laboratories performed analysis on the same MSC material using harmonised culture conditions and B-to understand source-specific differences. MethodsThree independent institutions performed a head-to-head comparison of human-derived adipose (A-), bone marrow (BM-), and umbilical cord (UC-) MSCs using harmonised culture conditions. In each centre, cells from one specific tissue source were isolated and later distributed across the network to assess their biological properties, including cell expansion, immune phenotype, and tri-lineage differentiation (part A). To assess tissue specific function, angiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and the in vivo biodistribution were compared in one expert lab (part B). ResultsBy implementing a harmonised manufacturing workflow, we obtained largely reproducible results across three independent laboratories in part A of our study. Unique growth patterns and differentiation potential were observed for each tissue source, with similar trends observed between centres. Immune phenotyping verified expression of typical MSC surface markers and absence of contaminating surface markers. Depending on the established protocols in the different laboratories, quantitative data varied slightly. Functional experiments in part B concluded that conditioned media from BM-MSCs significantly enhanced tubulogenesis and endothelial migration in vitro. In contrast, immunomodulatory studies reported superior immunosuppressive abilities for A-MSCs. Biodistribution studies in healthy mice showed lung entrapment after administration of all three types of MSCs, with a significantly faster clearance of BM-MSCs. ConclusionThese results show the heterogeneous behaviour and regenerative properties of MSCs as a reflection of intrinsic tissue-origin properties while providing evidence that the use of standardised culture procedures can reduce but not eliminate inter-lab and operator differences. HighlightsIn this study, we have: - Provided a harmonised manufacturing workflow that has demonstrated reproducible results across three independent laboratories when expanding MSCs. - Defined a multi-assay matrix capable of identifying functional differences in terms of angiogenesis, wound healing abilities and immunosuppressive properties. - Demonstrated similar in vivo biodistribution properties regardless of cell origin.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cells
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
2
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
4
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
5
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
12
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
15
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
24
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%
27
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
FEBS Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%