Back

Psychotropic drugs in Portugal from 2016 to 2019: a nationwide pharmacoepidemiological profile

Madeira, L.; Queiroz, G.; Henriques, R.

2022-09-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.09.14.22279819 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prescription of psychotropic medication is rising in Europe along the last decade. Exploring consumption patterns in pre-pandemic times in Portugal, as well as relevant socio-demographic determinants, can help establish comparisons with worldwide patterns and support public health policies for mental health. MethodsDescriptive, non-comparative cohort study, comprising full nationwide drug prescription records in Portugal along antidepressant, antipsychotic, and anxiolytic classes. Statistical analysis of prescription and consumption patterns according to reference dosages and guided by several criteria, including active substance, demographics, geography, associated medical specialty, and incurred costs. ResultsAn increase of 29.6% and 34.7% in the consumption of antipsychotics and antidepressants between 2016 and 2019 is highlighted, reasonably accompanied by an increase of 37M Eur in total expenditure (>20M Eur in public copay) for these classes of drugs. Disparities in sociodemographic and geographical incidence are identified. Amongst other pivotal results, we further observed that 64% of psychotropic drug prescriptions are undertaken by general practitioners, while only 21% undertaken by neurological and psychiatric specialties. ConclusionNationwide patterns of psychotropic drug prescription in Portugal reveal notable trends and determinants, establishing a reference point for cross-regional studies and being currently assessed at a national level to establish psychosocial initiatives and guidelines for the clinical practice and medical training. NoveltyTo our knowledge, first Portuguese psychopharmacoepidemiological study assessing: 1) economic correlates; 2) prescription patterns by medical specialty; 3) adherence rates and geographical determinants; 4) consumption patterns by active substance; and 5) systematic trends for the pre-pandemic period.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.