Back

Transcriptome analysis of the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicae reveals a biphasic mode of pathogenesis in Brassica juncea

Rajarammohan, S.

2022-09-13 plant biology
10.1101/2022.09.12.507536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alternaria blight or leaf spot caused by Alternaria brassicae has an enormous economic impact on the Brassica crops grown worldwide. Although the genome of A. brassicae has been sequenced, little is known about the genes that play a role during the infection of the host species. In this study, the transcriptome expression profile of A. brassicae during growth and infection was determined. Differential expression analysis revealed that 3921 genes were differentially expressed during infection. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis helped identify nine modules, which were highly correlated with growth and infection. Subsequent gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the modules highlighted the involvement of biological processes such as toxin metabolism, ribosome biogenesis, polysaccharide catabolism, copper ion transport, and vesicular trafficking during infection. Additionally, 194 CAZymes and 64 potential effectors were significantly upregulated during infection. Furthermore, 17 secondary metabolite gene clusters were also differentially expressed during infection. The clusters responsible for the production of Destruxin B, Brassicicene C, and HC-toxin were significantly upregulated during infection. Collectively, these results provide an overview of the critical pathways underlying the pathogenesis of A. brassicae and highlight the distinct gene networks that are temporally regulated, resulting in a biphasic mode of infection. The study thus provides novel insights into the transcriptional plasticity of a necrotrophic pathogen during infection of its host. Additionally, the in planta expression evidence for many potential effectors provides a theoretical basis for further investigations into the effector biology of necrotrophic pathogens such as A. brassicae.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
6
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
19
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
26
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%