Pea-adapted biotype of the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum induces susceptibility of pea to non-adapted biotype enabling improved feeding and performance
Shih, P.-Y.; Ollivier, R.; Cherqui, A.; Ameline, A.; Morliere, S.; Outreman, Y.; Simon, J.-C.; Sugio, A.
Show abstract
Most insect herbivores are adapted to feed on a few host plants only, but the mechanisms underlying plant specialization are poorly understood. One of the dominant hypotheses is that insects inject an oral secretion into the plant that manipulates the plants defences resulting in induced susceptibility. We tested this hypothesis on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), which forms multiple biotypes, each specialized on specific legume hosts. In particular, we tested whether a pea-adapted biotype can induce host susceptibility on pea, which should positively affect the fitness of a non-pea-adapted biotype. We found that survival and fecundity of an alfalfa-adapted biotype on pea were enhanced by co-infestation but not pre-infestation with a pea-adapted biotype. The electrical penetration graph (EPG) method was then used to dissect the components of alfalfa biotype feeding behaviour on pea with and without co-infestation by the pea biotype. While probing time did not differ between these two conditions, differences were observed in most other EPG parameters. When co-infested with the pea-adapted biotype, the alfalfa-adapted biotype was more likely to establish a phloem feeding and exhibited a longer ingestion time on pea. Our results clearly indicated that the pea-adapted biotype induced pea susceptibility by increasing the accessibility of non-pea-adapted aphids to the host phloem sap, and as a result, the alfalfa biotype increased its survival rate and fecundity. These results contribute to understanding how aphids manipulate their specific host plants.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) with knockdown resistance (kdr) to insecticide exhibit fitness trade-offs, including increased vulnerability to the natural enemy Aphidius ervi. 96%
- Both conventionally and organically fertilized tomatoes maintain fruit quality through uncontrolled green peach aphid infestation, with a transcriptional shift towards catabolism 94%
- Characterization of Components of Resistance to Corn Stunt Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dopamine pathway characterization during the reproductive mode switch in the pea aphid 95%
- Large-scale geographic survey provides insights into the colonization history of a major aphid pest on its cultivated apple host in Europe, North America and North Africa 92%
- Evolution within a given virulence phenotype (pathotype) is driven by changes in aggressiveness: a case study of French wheat leaf rust populations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common resistance mechanisms are deployed by plants against sap-feeding herbivorous insects: insights from a meta-analysis and systematic review 94%
- Ploidy dynamics in aphid host cells harboring bacterial symbionts 94%
- Synthetic Peptide Nucleic Acids in Action: In Vivo Interference of the groEL Gene from Pea Aphid Endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying environmental factors affecting the production of pea aphid dispersal morphs in field populations 96%
- Inducible tomato defences persist in detached leaves, despite differential plant variety and gene-dependent expression 91%
- Chemical convergence between a guild of facultative myrmecophilous caterpillars and host plants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca ST53 by the sharpshooter Cicadella viridis from different source plants and artificial diets 92%
- Comparison of in vitro and in planta toxicity of Vip3A for lepidopteran herbivores 92%
- Effects of maize development and phenology on the field infestation dynamics of the European Corn Borer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.