Back

Trends in Low-Value Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Parikh, R. B.; Civelek, Y.; Ozluk, P.; Drell, H. A.; DeBono, D.; Fisch, M. J.; Sylwestrzak, G.; Bekelman, J. E.; Schwartz, A. L.

2022-09-14 oncology
10.1101/2022.09.12.22279539 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLow-value services are common in cancer care. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic caused a dramatic decrease in health care utilization, leading many to suspect that low-value cancer services may decrease. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we used administrative claims from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment, a repository of medical and pharmacy data from US health plans representing over 80 million members, to identify 204,581 patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal, and/or lung cancer between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021. We used linear probability models to investigate the relation between the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and 5 guideline-based metrics of low-value cancer care: 1) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) instead of conventional CT imaging for initial staging; 2) conventional fractionation instead of hypofractionation for early-stage breast cancer; 3) non-guideline-based antiemetic use for minimal-, low-, or moderate-to-high-risk chemotherapies; 4) off-pathway systemic therapy; and 5) aggressive end-of-life care. ResultsAmong 204,581 patients, the mean [SD] age was 63.1 [13.2], 68.1% were female, 83,593 (40.8%) had breast cancer, 56,373 (27.5%) had colon cancer, and 64,615 (31.5%) had lung cancer. Rates of low-value cancer services did not exhibit meaningful declines during the pandemic: PET/CT imaging, adjusted percentage point difference 1.87 (95% CI -0.13 to 3.87); conventional radiotherapy, adjusted percentage point difference 3.93 (95% CI 1.50 to 6.36); off-pathway systemic therapy, adjusted percentage point difference 0.82 (95% CI -0.62 to 2.25); non-guideline-based antiemetics, adjusted percentage point difference -3.62 (95% CI -4.97 to -2.27); aggressive end-of-life care, adjusted percentage point difference 2.71 (95% CI -0.59 to 6.02). DiscussionLow-value cancer care remained prevalent through the pandemic. Policymakers should consider changes to payment and incentive design to turn the tide toward higher-value cancer care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
4
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
25
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%