Progression Analysis of Disease with Survival (PAD-S) by SurvMap identifies different prognostic subgroups of breast cancer in a large combined set of transcriptomics and methylation studies
Fores Martos, J.; Suay-Garcia, B.; Bosch-Romeu, R.; Sanfeliu-Alonso, M. C.; Falco, A.; Climent, J.
Show abstract
Progression analysis of disease (PAD) is a methodology that incorporates the output of Disease-Specific Genomic Analyses (DSGA) to an unsupervised classification scheme based on Topological Data Analysis (TDA). PAD makes use of data derived from healthy individuals to split individual diseased samples into healthy and disease components. Then, the shape characteristics of the disease component are extracted trough the generation of a combinatioral graph by means of the Mapper algorithm. In this paper we introduce a new filtering function for the Mapper algorithm that naturally integrates information on genes linked to disease-free or overall survival. We propose a new PAD-extended methodology termed Progression Analysis of Disease with Survival (PAD-S) and implement it in an R package called SurvMap which allows users to carry out all the steps involved in PAD-S, as well as in traditional PAD analyses. We tested PAD-S methodology using SurvMap on a large combined transcriptomics breast cancer dataset demonstrating its capacity to identify sets of samples displaying highly significant differences in terms of disease free survival (p = 8 x 10-14) and idiosyncratic biological features. PAD-S and SurvMap were also able to identify sets of samples with significantly different relapse-free survivals and molecular profiles inside breast cancer intrinsic subgroups (luminal A, luminal B, Her2, and basal). Finally, to illustrate that PAD-S and SurvMap are general-purpose analysis tools that can be applied to different types of omics data, we also carried out analyses in a breast cancer methylation dataset derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identifying groups of patients with significant differences in terms of overall survival and methylation profiles.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Prediction of Breast Cancer Survival through Coherent Voting Networks with Gene Expression Profiling 96%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 97%
- A Novel Tool for Multi-Omics Network Integration and Visualization: A Study of Glioma Heterogeneity 93%
- Risk assessment of cancer patients based on HLA-I alleles, neobinders and expression of cytokines 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.