Back

Associations between brood size, gut microbiome diversity and survival in great tit (Parus major) nestlings

Liukkonen, M.; Hukkanen, M.; Cossin-Sevrin, N.; Stier, A.; Vesterinen, E.; Grond, K.; Ruuskanen, S.

2022-09-08 ecology
10.1101/2022.09.06.506880 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe gut microbiome forms at an early stage, yet data on the environmental factors influencing the development of wild avian microbiomes is limited. As the gut microbiome is a vital part of organismal health, it is important to understand how it may connect to host performance. The early studies with wild gut microbiome have shown that the rearing environment may be of importance in gut microbiome formation, yet the results vary across taxa, and the effects of specific environmental factors have not been characterized. Here, wild great tit (Parus major) broods were manipulated to either reduce or enlarge the original brood soon after hatching. We investigated if brood size was associated with nestling bacterial gut microbiome, and whether gut microbiome diversity predicted survival. Fecal samples were collected at mid-nestling stage and sequenced with the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and nestling growth and survival were measured. ResultsGut microbiome diversity showed high variation between individuals, but this variation was not significantly explained by brood size or body mass. Additionally, we did not find a significant effect of brood size on body mass or gut microbiome composition. We also demonstrated that early handling had no impact on nestling performance or gut microbiome. Furthermore, we found no significant association between gut microbiome diversity and short-term (survival to fledging) or mid-term (apparent juvenile) survival. ConclusionsWe found no clear association between early-life environment, offspring condition and gut microbiome. This suggests that brood size is not a significantly contributing factor to great tit nestling condition, and that other environmental and genetic factors may be more strongly linked to offspring condition and gut microbiome. Future studies should expand into other early-life environmental factors e.g., diet composition and quality, and parental influences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.9%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%