Back

Persistence of a SARS-CoV-2 variant with a frameshifting deletion for the duration of a major outbreak

Foster, C. S. P.; Bull, R.; Tedla, N.; Santiago, F.; Agapiou, D.; Adhikari, A.; Walker, G. J.; Shrestha, L. B.; van Hal, S.; Kim, K. W.; Rawlinson, W. D.

2022-09-09 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2022.09.06.22279658 medRxiv
Show abstract

Australia experienced widespread COVID-19 outbreaks from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant between June 2021 and February 2022. Whole-genome sequencing of virus from an early case revealed a sub-consensus level of sequencing reads supporting a 17-nucleotide frameshift-inducing deletion in ORF7a that truncated the peptide sequence. The variant rapidly became represented at the consensus level (Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del) in most of the outbreak cases in Australia. Retrospective analysis of ORF7a deletions in all GISAID clade GK Delta genomes showed that of 4,018,216 genomes, 134,751 ([~]3.35%) possessed a deletion in ORF7a, with the ORF7a{Delta}17del mutation by far the most common. Approximately 99.05% of Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del genomes on GISAID originated from the Australian Delta outbreak, and comprised 87% of genomes in the outbreak. In vitro comparison of lineages in cell culture showed a significantly greater proportion of cells were infected with Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del than with a contemporaneous Delta variant without ORF7a{Delta}17del (Delta-ORF7aintact), and the proportion was also measurably higher than an early SARS-CoV-2 strain (A.2.2). These results showed that Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del potentially has a slight growth advantage compared to Delta-ORF7aintact. Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del viruses still produced ORF7a protein, but significantly less than A.2.2, in a different cellular distribution with a more diffuse expression throughout the cytoplasm of infected cells. These data suggest that the proliferation of Delta-ORF7a{Delta}17del genomes during the Australian Delta outbreak was likely not a result of an intrinsic benefit of the ORF7a{Delta}17del mutation, but rather a chance founder effect. Nonetheless, the abundance of different ORF7a deletions in genomes worldwide suggests these have some benefit to virus transmission. IMPORTANCEDeletions in the ORF7a region of SARS-CoV-2 have been noted since early in the COVID-19 pandemic, but are generally reported as transient mutations that are quickly lost in the population. Consequently, ORF7a deletions are considered disadvantageous to the virus through possible loss-of-function effects. In constrast to these earlier reports, we present the first report of a SARS-CoV-2 variant with an ORF7a deletion that dominated for the entirety of a protracted outbreak, and found no associated fitness disadvantage or advantage in cell culture. The relatively common rise and fall of ORF7a deletion variants over time likely represent chance founder events followed by proliferation until a more fit variant(s) is introduced to the population. Our global clade-level survey of ORF7a deletions will be a useful resource for future studies into this gene region.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
4
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%