Transgressive and parental dominant gene expression and cytosine methylation during seed development in Brassica napus hybrids
Orantes-Bonilla, M.; Wang, H.; Lee, H.; Golicz, A. A.; Hu, D.; Li, W.; Zou, J.; Snowdon, R. J.
Show abstract
The enhanced performance of hybrids though heterosis remains a key aspect in plant breeding, however the underlying mechanisms are still not fully elucidated. To investigate the potential role of transcriptomic and epigenomic patterns in early expression of hybrid vigour, we investigated gene expression, small RNA abundance and genome-wide methylation in hybrids from two distant Brassica napus ecotypes during seed and seedling developmental stages using next-generation sequencing technologies. A total of 71217, 773, 79518 and 31825 differentially expressed genes, microRNAs, small interfering RNAs and differentially methylated regions were identified, respectively. Approximately 70% of the differential expression and methylation patterns observed could be explained due to parental dominance levels. Via gene ontology enrichment and microRNA-target association analyses during seed development we found copies of reproductive, developmental and meiotic genes with transgressive and paternal dominance patterns. Interestingly, maternal dominance was more prominent in hypermethylated and downregulated features during seed formation. This contrasts to the general maternal gamete demethylation reported during gametogenesis in most plant species. Associations between methylation and gene expression allowed identification of putative epialleles with diverse pivotal biological functions during seed formation. Furthermore, most differentially methylated regions, differentially expressed siRNAs and transposable elements were found in regions flanking genes that had no differential expression. This suggests that differential expression and methylation of epigenomic features may help maintain expression of pivotal genes in a hybrid context. Differential expression and methylation patterns during seed formation in an F1 hybrid provide novel insight into genes and mechanisms with a potential role in early heterosis. Key messageTranscriptomic and epigenomic profiling of gene expression and small RNAs during seed and seedling development reveals expression and methylation dominance levels with implications on early stage heterosis in oilseed rape.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequent spontaneous structural rearrangements promote rapid genome diversification in a Brassica napus F1 generation 97%
- Industrial chicory genome gives insight into the molecular time table of anther development and male sterility 96%
- The molecular basis of Kale domestication: Transcription profiling of leaves and meristems provides new insights into the evolution of a Brassica oleracea vegetative morphotype 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct access to millions of mutations by Whole Genome Sequencing of an oilseed rape mutant population 96%
- Systematic analysis of 1,298 RNA-Seq samples and construction of a comprehensive soybean (Glycine max) expression atlas 96%
- A transcriptome atlas of zygotic and somatic embryogenesis in Norway spruce 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct classes of 21 and 24-nt phasiRNAs suggest diverse mechanisms of biogenesis and function in rice anther development 96%
- Camelina CircRNA Landscape: Implications for Gene Regulation and Fatty Acid Metabolism 95%
- New insights into homoeologous copy number variations in the hexaploid wheat genome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- HybridExpress: an R/Bioconductor package for comparative transcriptomic analyses of hybrids and their progenitors 96%
- Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions 96%
- afila, the origin and nature of a major innovation in the history of pea breeding 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.