Back

Habitat use differences mediate anthropogenic threat exposure in white sturgeon

Walter, J. A.; Singer, G. P.; Reuman, D. C.; Colborne, S. F.; Sheppard, L. W.; O'Donnell, D. R.; Coombs, N.; Johnston, M.; Miller, E. A.; Steel, A. E.; Kelly, J. T.; Fangue, N. A.; Rypel, A. L.

2022-09-02 ecology
10.1101/2022.08.31.505999 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding intraspecific variation in habitat use, particularly of long-lived fishes across multiple life history stages, is core to improved conservation management. Here, we present results from a synthesis of acoustic telemetry data for large juvenile and adult white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) from 2010 to 2017 in the San Francisco Estuary and Sacramento River ecosystems. We focused primarily on uncovering spatial patterns of inferred habitat occupancy across life stages, and on linking habitat use to population threats. We found substantial differences in habitat use across individuals and over time that was related to fish age class. However, differences in habitat use were not explained by fish sex or water year flow conditions. We estimated an index of angling exposure, which showed that fish entering reproductive maturity, which historically were of harvestable size, were detected less often than other sizes in areas with high angler pressure, suggesting possible behavioral avoidance of areas of high angler pressure. Additionally, we used historical data to evaluate potential exposure of white sturgeon to a severe red tide event in late summer 2022. We found that >50% of reproductive-age fish may have been residing in areas affected by the red tide. Future monitoring and management of white sturgeon might benefit from examining multiple phases of white sturgeon life history. For example, additional tracking studies could improve understanding of juvenile habitat use, adult survival rates, patterns of anadromy, and cross-basin habitat utilization.

Published in Environmental Biology of Fishes · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
13
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
23
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%