Diversity and functional analysis of rumen and fecal microbial communities associated with dietary changes in crossbreed dairy cattle
Kibegwa, F.; Bett, R. C.; Gachuiri, C. K.; Machuka, E.; Stomeo, F.; Mujibi, F. D.
Show abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of varying roughage and concentrate proportions, in diet of crossbreed dairy cattle, on the composition and associated functional genes of rumen and fecal microbiota. We also explored fecal samples as a proxy for rumen liquor samples. Six crossbred dairy cattle were reared on three diets with an increasing concentrate and reducing roughage amount in three consecutive 10-day periods. After each period, individual rumen liquor and fecal samples were collected and analyzed through shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Average relative abundance of identified Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) and microbial functional roles from all animals were compared between diets and sample types (fecal and rumen liquor). Results indicated that dietary modifications significantly affected several rumen and fecal microbial OTUs. In the rumen, an increase in dietary concentrate resulted in an upsurge in the abundance of Proteobacteria, while reducing the proportions of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Conversely, changes in microbial composition in fecal samples were not consistent with dietary modification patterns. Microbial functional pathway classification identified that carbohydrate metabolism and protein metabolism pathways dominated microbial roles. Assessment of dietary effects on the predicted functional roles of these microbiota revealed that a high amount of dietary concentrate resulted in an increase in central carbohydrate metabolism and a corresponding reduction in protein synthesis. Moreover, we identified several microbial stress-related responses linked to dietary changes. Bacteroides and Clostridium genera were the principal hosts of these microbial functions. Therefore, the roughage to concentrate proportion has more influence on the microbial composition and microbial functional genes in rumen samples than fecal samples. As such, we did not establish a significant relationship between the rumen and fecal metagenome profiles, and the rumen and fecal microbiota from one animal did not correlate more than those from different animals.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unraveling the gut microbiota of Tibetan chickens: insights into highland adaptation and ecological advantages 96%
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes 95%
- Uncovering Changes in Microbiome Profiles Across Commercial and Backyard Poultry Farming Systems 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omics analyses reveal rumen microbes and secondary metabolites that are unique to livestock species 97%
- Unique features of the gut microbiome characterized in animal models of Angelman Syndrome 94%
- The impact of kit, environment and sampling contamination on the observed microbiome of bovine milk 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-body Microbiota of Newborn Calves and Their Response to Prenatal Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation 96%
- Characterization of the microbiota associated with 12-week-old bovine fetuses exposed to divergent in utero nutrition 96%
- Efficacy of fecal sampling as a gut proxy in the study of chicken gut microbiota 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the use of bovine buccal sampling as a proxy for the rumen microbiota using a time course and random forest classification approach 97%
- Longitudinal metatranscriptomic analysis of a meat spoilage microbiome detects abundant continued fermentation and environmental stress responses during shelf life and beyond. 94%
- Purified diets containing high levels of soluble fiber and grain-based diets promote similar gastrointestinal morphometry yet distinct microbial communities 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.