Back

Effectiveness of endurance training rehabilitation after hospitalisation in intensive care for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome on dyspnoea (RECOVER): a randomised controlled, open-label multicentre trial

Romanet, C.; Wormser, J.; Fels, A.; Lucas, P.; Prudat, C.; Sacco, E.; Bruel, C.; Pantefeve, G.; Pene, F.; Chatellier, G.; Philippart, F.

2022-08-30 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2022.08.29.22279327 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCOVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) is the severe evolution of the Sars-Cov-2 infection leading to an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Its onset is associated with "long-covid" including persisting respiratory disorders up to one year. Rehabilitation is suggested by most guidelines in the treatment of "long-covid". As no randomised controlled trial did support its use in "long-covid" we aimed to evaluate the effects of endurance training rehabilitation (ETR) on dyspnoea in "long-covid" following CARDS. MethodsIn this multicentre, two-arm, parallel, open, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial performed in three French ICU, we enrolled adults previously admitted for CARDS, discharged for at least three months and presenting an mMRC dyspnea scale score > 1. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either ETR or standard physiotherapy (SP), both for three months. Outcomes assessors were masked to treatment assignment. Primary outcome was dyspnoeas evolution, measured by Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) at inclusion and after 90 days. ResultsBetween August 7, 2020 and January 26, 2022, 871 COVID-19 patients were screened, of whom 60 were randomly assigned to ETR (n=27) or SP (n=33). Mean MDP score after treatment was significantly lower in the ETR group than in the SP group (26.15 [SD 15.48] vs. 44.76 [SD 19.25]; mean difference -18.61 [95% CI -27.78 to -9.44]; p<0.0001). ConclusionCARDS patients suffering from breathlessness three months after discharge improved their dyspnoea significantly more when treated with ETR for three months rather than with SP.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.1%
2
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
3
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%