Back

Predicting the response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Can the addition of tomosynthesis improve the accuracy of CESM? A comparison with breast MRI.

Savaridas, S.; Vinnicombe, S. L.; Warwick, V.; Evans, A.

2022-08-30 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2022.08.26.22279254 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is used to downstage breast cancer prior to surgery. Image monitoring is essential to guide treatment and to assess in vivo chemosensitivity. Breast MRI is considered the gold-standard imaging technique; however, it is contraindicated or poorly tolerated in some patients and may be hard to access. Evidence suggests contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) may approach the accuracy of MRI. This novel pilot study investigates whether the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to CESM increases the accuracy of response prediction. ResultsSixteen cancers in fourteen patients were imaged with CESM+DBT and MRI following completion of NACT. Ten cancers demonstrated pathological complete response (pCR) defined as absence of residual invasive disease. Greatest accuracy for predicting pCR was with CESM contrast-enhancement only (accuracy 81.3%, sensitivity 100%, specificity 57.1%), followed by MRI (accuracy 62.5%, sensitivity 44.4%, specificity 85.7%). Concordance with invasive tumour size was greater for CESM than MRI, concordance-coefficients 0.70 vs 0.66 respectively. MRI demonstrated greatest concordance with whole tumour size followed by CESM contrast-enhancement plus microcalcification, concordance-coefficients 0.86 vs 0.69. The addition of DBT did not improve accuracy for prediction of pCR or residual disease size. Whereas CESM+DBT tended to underestimate size of residual disease, MRI tended to overestimate but no significant differences were seen (p>0.05). ConclusionsCESM contrast-enhancement plus microcalcification is similar to MRI for predicting residual disease post-NACT. Size of enhancement alone demonstrates best concordance with invasive disease. Inclusion of residual microcalcification improves concordance with DCIS. The addition of DBT to CESM does not improve accuracy. HighlightsO_LINo benefit of adding DBT to CESM for NACT response prediction C_LIO_LICESM appears similar to MRI for predicting response to NACT C_LIO_LICESM has greatest accuracy for residual invasive tumour size. C_LIO_LICESM+calcification has greater accuracy for predicting residual in situ disease. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
4
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
14
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%