Back

Beet curly top Iran virus Rep and V2 gene work as silencing suppressors through separate mechanisms

Ebrahimi, S.; Bassler, A.; Eini, O.; Yildirim, Z.; Wassenegger, M.; Krczal, G.; Uslu, V. V.

2022-08-26 plant biology
10.1101/2022.08.25.505242 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Beet curly top Iran Virus (BCTIV) is a yield-limiting geminivirus belonging to the becurtovirus genus. The genome organization of BCTIV is unique such that the complementary strand of BCTIV resembles mastreviruses, whereas the virion strand organization is close to curtoviruses. Geminiviruses are known to avoid the plant defense system by suppressing the RNA interference mechanisms both at the transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) and post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) level. Multiple geminivirus genes have been identified as viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSR) but VSR activity remains elusive in becurtoviruses. By screening all verified open reading frames in the BCTIV genome, we found that only V2 and Rep were able to suppress specific PTGS mechanisms, triggered by the expression of a partial or full-length sense-strand transcript of the target gene (S-PTGS). BCTIV-V2 could suppress S-PTGS more efficiently than BCTIV-Rep when then the target GFP gene is transiently expressed. On the other hand, S-PTGS is suppressed by Rep but not V2 when target GFP is only stably expressed. Deletional mutagenesis of BCTIV-Rep implicated that multiple domains are required for its VSR activity. Furthermore, neither V2 nor Rep could fully suppress local PTGS induced by inverted repeat targeting GFP (GFP-IR). Also, in a closer look at the spread of local silencing by GFP-IR, we observed that V2 or Rep are not able to suppress the movement of sRNAs. Nevertheless, Rep suppressed the systemic silencing induced by GFP-IR in 16C plants. Northern blot analyses showed that BCTIV-Rep inhibits silencing by mitigating sRNA production, whereas BCTIV-V2 does not alter sRNA levels. In summary, both the silencing phenotype and the molecular signatures of silencing implicate distinct modes of VSR activity of BCTIV-Rep and -V2.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
6
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
7
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
10
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.0%
22
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
26
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%