Evaluation of Transfer Learning Methods for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease with Brain MRI
Dhinagar, N. J.; Thomopoulos, S. I.; Rajagopalan, P.; Stripelis, D.; Ambite, J. L.; Steeg, G. V.; Thompson, P. M.
Show abstract
Deep neural networks show great promise for classifying brain diseases and making prognostic assessments based on neuroimaging data, but large, labeled training datasets are often required to achieve high predictive accuracy. Here we evaluated a range of transfer learning or pre-training strategies to create useful MRI representations for downstream tasks that lack large amounts of training data, such as Alzheimers disease (AD) classification. To test our proposed pre-training strategies, we analyzed 4,098 3D T1-weighted brain MRI scans from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort and independently validated with an out-of-distribution test set of 600 scans from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS3) cohort for detecting AD. First, we trained 3D and 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. We tested combinations of multiple pre-training strategies based on (1) supervised, (2) contrastive learning, and (3) self-supervised learning - using pre-training data within versus outside the MRI domain. In our experiments, the 3D CNN pre-trained with contrastive learning provided the best overall results - when fine-tuned on T1-weighted scans for AD classification - outperformed the baseline by 2.8% when trained with all of the training data from ADNI. We also show test performance as a function of the training dataset size and the chosen pre-training method. Transfer learning offered significant benefits in low data regimes, with a performance boost of 7.7%. When the pre-trained model was used for AD classification, we were able to visualize an improved clustering of test subjects diagnostic groups, as illustrated via a uniform manifold approximation (UMAP) projection of the high-dimensional model embedding space. Further, saliency maps indicate the additional activation regions in the brain scan using pre-training, that then maximally contributed towards the final prediction score.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 97%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
- HAVAs: Alzheimer’s Disease Detection using Normative and Pathological Lifespan Models 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated MRI-based Analysis of the Locus Coeruleus in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia using ELSI-Net 96%
- Investigating the Amyloid-Tau-Neurodegeneration Framework in Alzheimer's Disease Using Semi-Supervised Multimodal Imaging Data Fusion 95%
- NeuropsychBrainAge: a biomarker for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-Sequence Average Templates for Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease Populations 96%
- Lifespan reference curves for harmonizing multi-site regional brain white matter metrics from diffusion MRI 94%
- An Annotated Multi-Site and Multi-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dataset for the study of the Human Tongue Musculature 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.