Back

Probing weak lipid-lipid binding domain interactions with a mechanically transduced immunosorbent assay (METRIS)

Steimel, J.; Sarkis, J.; Capraro, B. R.; Kirchhausen, T.; Alexander-Katz, A.

2022-08-22 biophysics
10.1101/2022.08.22.504198 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-lipid interactions constitute a very important class of biological interactions critical for multiple cell and tissue functions. It is believed that most lipid-protein interactions are very weak, with affinities in the 1mM-1M range. Here we study the interactions of multiple protein lipid binding domains with lipid membranes containing signaling lipids known as phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs) using a new mechanically transduced immunosorbent assay (METRIS). We demonstrate that this assay can measure extremely weak interactions at PIP bilayer concentrations below 1%, which is close to the biological lipid concentration regime. In particular, we have studied the interaction of DrrAWT, DrrAK568A, PH-{delta}, and 2XFYVE as well as previously unexplored lipid binding domains such as Auxilin 1 (PTEN) and Auxilin 2 (GAK) against a wide palette of PIPs. Our results confirm that each of these domains interacts specifically with a PIP partner. In the case of Auxilin 1 and Auxilin 2, both proteins in the Clathrin endocytotic pathway, we find that their PTEN-like domain interacts specifically yet with ultra low affinity with PI3P and PI4P respectively. We have also found a new unknown medium-high affinity interaction between GAK with PI34P2. Our work, thus, provides a direct and robust method to measure and catalog protein lipid interactions which are important in many processes such as signaling and membrane sculpting. Furthermore, this assay can be extended in a straightforward manner to study other interactions such as ligand-receptor or antibody-antigen.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.