Back

A Comparison of Representation Learning Methods for Medical Concepts in MIMIC-IV

Wu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Clifton, D. A.

2022-08-22 health informatics
10.1101/2022.08.21.22278835 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo compare and release the diagnosis (ICD-10-CM), procedure (ICD-10-PCS), and medication (NDC) concept (code) embeddings trained by Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Word2Vec, GloVe, and BERT, for more efficient electronic health record (EHR) data analysis. Materials and MethodsThe embeddings were pre-trained by the four aforementioned models separately using the diagnosis, procedure, and medication information in MIMIC-IV. We interpreted the embeddings by visualizing them in 2D space and used the silhouette coefficient to assess the clustering ability of these embeddings. Furthermore, we evaluated the embeddings in three downstream tasks without fine-tuning: next visit diagnoses prediction, ICU patients mortality prediction, and medication recommendation. ResultsWe found that embeddings pre-trained by GloVe have the best performance in the downstream tasks and the best interpretability for all diagnosis, procedure, and medication codes. In the next-visit diagnosis prediction, the accuracy of using GloVe embeddings was 12.2% higher than the baseline, which is the random generator. In the other two prediction tasks, GloVe improved the accuracy by 2%-3% over the baseline. LDA, Word2Vec, and BERT marginally improved the results over the baseline in most cases. Discussion and ConclusionGloVe shows superiority in mining diagnoses, procedures, and medications information of MIMIC-IV compared with LDA, Word2Vec, and BERT. Besides, we found that the granularity of training samples can affect the performance of models according to the downstream task and pre-train data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.