Prevalence and Characterization of Bacteria Present in the Nasopharynx of Outpatients with and without SARS-CoV-2
Shurko, J.; Mares, C. A.; Page, R. B.; Lopez, K.; Nguyen, V.; Vanee, N.; Mishra, P. K.
Show abstract
COVID-19 has emerged as a highly contagious and debilitating disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and has claimed the lives of over 6.8 million people worldwide. Bacterial co-infections are one of many co-morbidities that have been suggested to impact the outcome of COVID-19 in patients. The primary goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of bacterial co-infections and to describe any trends observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. To do this, we investigated SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial co-infections from outpatient RT-PCR testing in Texas. The results indicate Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae were the most frequently detected bacterial pathogens in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients and that these bacterial pathogens were present in these two patient populations at similar proportions. We also detected Staphylococcus aureus in a significantly larger proportion of males relative to females and people under 65 years of age relative to those 65 and over. Finally, we found that Hispanics were 75% more likely to be SARS-CoV-2 positive than non-Hispanics. The results suggest that COVID-19 patients may benefit from rapid diagnostic tests for bacterial pathogens and that this information could help delineate targeted antimicrobial therapy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimated Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Adults in Orange County, California 93%
- Association of Chronic Acid Suppression and Social Determinants of Health with COVID-19 Infection 93%
- Are commercial antibody assays substantially underestimating SARS-CoV-2 ever infection? An analysis on a population-based sample in a high exposure setting 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Specimen Quality and Results from a Community-Wide, Home-Based Respiratory Surveillance Study 94%
- Universal PCR for Bacteria, Mycobacteria, and Fungi: A 10-year Retrospective Review of Clinical Indications and Patient Outcomes 94%
- Differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 naturally infected and vaccinated individuals in an inner-city emergency department 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and Factors Associated with COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Mortality Across Race and Ethnicity 94%
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 93%
- Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 94%
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 94%
- Detection of bacterial co-infections and prediction of fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department using a 29 mRNA host response classifier 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.