Back

Field assessment of BinaxNOW antigen tests as COVID-19 treatment entry point at a community testing site in San Francisco during evolving omicron surges

Schrom, J.; Marquez, C.; Wang, C.-Y.; Saxena, A.; Mitchell, A.; Ribeiro, S.; Pilarowski, G.; Nakamura, R.; Rojas, S.; Black, D.; Contreras Oseguera, M.; Castellanos Diaz, E.; Payan, J.; Rojas, S.; Jones, D.; Tulier-Laiwa, V.; Zavaleta, A.; Martinez, J.; Chamie, G.; Glaser, C.; Jacobson, K.; Petersen, M.; DeRisi, J.; Havlir, D.

2022-08-18 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.08.17.22278913 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCOVID-19 oral treatments require initiation within 5 days of symptom onset. Although antigen tests are less sensitive than RT-PCR, rapid results could facilitate entry to treatment. As SARS-CoV-2 variants and host immunity evolve, it is important to characterize the use case for rapid antigen tests for treatment entry. MethodsWe collected anterior nasal swabs for BinaxNOW and RT-PCR testing and clinical data at a walk-up, community site in San Francisco, California between January and June 2022. SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences were generated from positive samples and classified according to subtype and variant. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to estimate the expected proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected persons who would have been diagnosed within 5 days of symptom onset using RT-PCR versus BinaxNOW testing. ResultsAmong 25,309 persons tested with BinaxNOW, 2,952 had concomitant RT-PCR. 1321/2952 (44.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive. We identified waves of predominant omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12, BA.4, and BA.5 among 720 sequenced samples. Among 1,321 RT-PCR positive samples, 938/1321 (71%) were detected by BinaxNOW; 95% (774/817) of those with Ct value <30 were detected by BinaxNOW. BinaxNOW detection was consistent over lineages. In analyses to evaluate entry to treatment, BinaxNOW detected 82.7% (410/496, 95% CI: 79-86%) of persons with COVID-19 within 5 days of symptom onset. In comparison, RT-PCR (24-hour turnaround) detected 83.1% (412/496 95% CI: 79-86%) and RT-PCR (48-hour turnaround) detected 66.3% (329/496 95% CI: 62-70%) of persons with COVID-19 within 5 days of symptom onset. ConclusionsBinaxNOW detected high viral load from anterior nasal swabs consistently across omicron sublineages emerging between January and June of 2022. Simulations support BinaxNOW as an entry point for COVID-19 treatment in a community field setting.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%