Uptake of Sotrovimab for prevention of severe COVID-19 and its safety in the community in England
Patone, M.; Tibble, H.; Snelling, A. J.; Coupland, C.; Sheikh, A.; Hippisley-Cox, J.
Show abstract
Sotrovimab is a neutralising monoclonal antibody (nMAB), currently administrated in England to treat extremely clinically vulnerable COVID-19 patients. Trials have shown it to have mild or moderate side effects, however safety in real-world settings has not been yet evaluated. We used national databases to investigate its uptake and safety in community patients across England. We used a cohort study to describe uptake and a self-controlled case series design to evaluate the risks of 49 pre-specified suspected adverse events in the 2-28 days post-treatment. Between December 11, 2021 and May 24, 2022, there were 172,860 COVID-19 patients eligible for treatment. Of the 22,815 people who received Sotrovimab, 21,487 (94.2%) had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and 5,999 (26.3%) were not on the eligible list. Between treated and untreated eligible individuals, the mean age (54.6, SD: 16.1 vs 54.1, SD: 18.3) and sex distribution (women: 60.9% vs 58.1%; men: 38.9% vs 41.1%) were similar. There were marked variations in uptake between ethnic groups, which was higher amongst Indian (15.0%; 95%CI 13.8, 16.3), Other Asian (13.7%; 95%CI 11.9, 15.8), White (13.4%; 95%CI 13.3, 13.6), and Bangladeshi (11.4%; 95%CI 8.8, 14.6); and lower amongst Black Caribbean individuals (6.4%; 95%CI 5.4, 7.5) and Black Africans (4.7%; 95%CI 4.1, 5.4). We found no increased risk of any of the suspected adverse events in the overall period of 2-28 days post-treatment, but an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis (IRR 3.08, 95% CI 1.44, 6.58) and of systematic lupus erythematosus (IRR 5.15, 95% CI 1.60, 16.60) in the 2-3 days post-treatment, when we narrowed the risk period. FundingNational Institute of Health Research (Grant reference 135561)
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Efficacy of Pemivibart, a Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody, for Prevention of Symptomatic COVID-19: Interim Results From the CANOPY Clinical Trial 93%
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 93%
- Favipiravir for treatment of outpatients with asymptomatic or uncomplicated COVID-19: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Is convalescent plasma futile in COVID-19? A Bayesian re-analysis of the RECOVERY randomised controlled trial 94%
- Effectiveness of the neutralizing antibody sotrovimab among high-risk patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 in Qatar 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health care workers: a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial (HERO-HCQ) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of camostat mesilate (FOY-305) for the treatment of COVID-19 (CANDLE study) 94%
- Determinants of pre-vaccination antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 92%
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab on preventing hospital admission among higher-risk patients with COVID-19 in Wales: a retrospective cohort study 96%
- The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19 95%
- Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (AZD7442) for the treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.