Back

Short and long-term outcomes of outborn vs. inborn infants <32 weeks in Western Australia: A cohort study of infants born between 2005 and 2018.

Davis, J. W.; Seeber, C.; Gill, A.; Nathan, E.; Strunk, T.; Sharp, M.

2022-08-16 pediatrics
10.1101/2022.08.13.22278651 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo compare mortality and morbidity of inborn vs outborn very preterm infants <32 weeks in Western Australia between 2005 and 2018. DesignRetrospective cohort study PatientsInfants <32 weeks born in Western Australia Main outcome measuresMortality was assessed as death before discharge home from the tertiary NICU. Clinically significant short-term morbidities included combined brain injury (intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) Grade [&ge;] 3 and cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL)) and other important major neonatal outcomes. Standardised developmental assessments up to 5 years of age were evaluated where available. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis of outborn status on outcomes, controlling for gestational age, birthweight z-score, sex and multiple birth ResultsA total of 4974 infants were born in WA between 22 - 32 weeks gestation between 2005 - 2018 of which 4237 (89.6%) inborn and 443 (10.4%) outborn were compared. Overall mortality to discharge was higher in outborn infants (20.5% (91/443) vs. 7.4% (314/4237); aOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.60-3.70, p<0.001). Outborn infants had higher rates of combined brain injury than those inborn (10.7% (41/384) vs. 6.0% (246/4115); adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.37 - 2.86), p<0.001). No difference in long-term neurodevelopmental measures was detected, however, long-term follow-up data were available for only 65% of outborn and 79% of inborn infants. ConclusionsOutborn preterm infants <32 weeks in WA have increased odds of mortality, and combined brain injury than those inborn. Long-term outcome results is likely to be affected by incomplete follow-up data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.