Back

Clustering of adverse health and educational outcomes in adolescence following early childhood poverty: implications for UK's 'levelling up' agenda

Villadsen, A.; Asaria, M.; Skarda, I.; Mon-Williams, M.; Ploubidis, G.; Brunner, E.; Cookson, R.

2022-08-12 public and global health
10.1101/2022.08.11.22278671 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly childhood poverty is associated with poorer health and educational outcomes in adolescence. However, there is limited evidence about the clustering of these adverse outcomes by income group. MethodsWe analysed five outcomes at age 17 known to limit life chances - psychological distress, self-assessed ill health, smoking, obesity, and poor educational achievement - using data from the longitudinal UK Millennium Cohort Study (N=15,245). We compared how single and multiple outcomes were distributed across quintiles of household income in early childhood (0-5 years) and modelled the maximum potential benefit of tackling the income gradient in these outcomes. FindingsChildren from the poorest households were 12.7(95% CI 6.4-25.1) times more likely than those from the richest to experience four or five adverse adolescent outcomes, with poor educational achievement and smoking showing the largest single risk ratios-4.6(95% CI: 4.2-5.0) and 3.6(95% CI 3.0-4.2), respectively. We modelled hypothetical absolute and relative poverty elimination scenarios, as well as an income inequality elimination scenario, and found these would yield maximum reductions in multiple adolescent adversity of 5%, 30%, and 80% respectively. InterpretationEarly childhood poverty is more strongly correlated with multiple adolescent adversity than any single adverse outcome. Reducing absolute poverty alone is not sufficient to eliminate the life-long burden of multiple adversity, which disproportionately impacts children across the bottom three-fifths of the income distribution. An ambitious levelling up agenda needs co-ordinated multi-agency action to tackle the complex interacting factors generating the steep social gradient in multiple adolescent adversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.2%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
9
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
16
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
24
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%