Back

Characteristics of people with type I or type II diabetes with and without a history of homelessness: a population-based cohort study

Wiens, K.; Bai, L.; Austin, P. C.; Ronksley, P. E.; Hwang, S. W.; Spackman, E.; Booth, G. L.; Campbell, D. J. T.

2022-08-12 endocrinology
10.1101/2022.08.11.22278127
Show abstract

IntroductionHomelessness poses unique barriers to diabetes management. Population-level data on the risks of diabetes outcomes among people experiencing homelessness are needed to inform resource investment. The aim of this study was to create a population cohort of people with diabetes with a history of homelessness to understand their unique demographic and clinical characteristics and improve long-term health outcomes. MethodsOntario residents with diabetes were identified in administrative hospital databases between 2006 and 2020. A history of homelessness was identified using a validated algorithm. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between people with and without a history of homelessness. Propensity score matching was used to create a cohort of people with diabetes experiencing homelessness matched to comparable non-homeless controls. ResultsOf the 1,455,567 patients with diabetes who used hospital services, 0.7% (n=8,599) had a history of homelessness. Patients with a history of homelessness were younger (mean: 54 vs 66 years), more likely to be male (66% vs 51%) and more likely to live in a large urban centre (25% vs 7%). Notably, they were also more likely to be diagnosed with mental illness (49% vs 2%) and be admitted to a designated inpatient mental health bed (37% versus 1%). A suitable match was found for 5219 (75%) people with documented homelessness. The derived matched cohort was balanced on important demographic and clinical characteristics. ConclusionPeople with diabetes experiencing homelessness have unique characteristics that may require additional supports. Population-level comparisons can inform the delivery of tailored diabetes care and self-management resources.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
20.7%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 11%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 55%
8.0%
4
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.9%
8.0%
5
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.7%
5.0%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
14
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
15
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
16
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 79%
1.3%
19
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
21
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 20%
0.8%
22
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 24%
0.7%
24
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.7%