Back

'It's a helluva journey': A qualitative study of patient and clinician experiences of nausea and vomiting syndromes and functional dyspepsia

Sebaratnam, G.; Law, M.; Broadbent, E.; Gharibans, A. A.; Andrews, C. N.; Daker, C.; O'Grady, G.; Calder, S.; Keane, C.

2022-08-10 gastroenterology
10.1101/2022.08.09.22278607 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic gastroduodenal disorders including chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome, gastroparesis, and functional dyspepsia, are challenging to diagnose and manage. The diagnostic and treatment pathways for these disorders are complex, costly and overlap substantially; however, experiences of this pathway have not been thoroughly investigated. This study therefore aimed to explore clinician and patient perspectives on the current clinical pathway. MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted between June 2020 and June 2022 with 11 patients with chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome alone or with functional dyspepsia (based on Rome IV criteria) and nine gastroenterologists who treat these conditions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using an iterative, inductive approach. ResultsFive key patient themes were identified: (1) the impacts of their chronic gastroduodenal symptoms, (2) the complexity of the clinical journey, (3) their interactions with healthcare providers, (4) the need for advocacy, and (5) their experience of treatments. Five key clinician themes were also identified: (1) these conditions were seen as clinically complex, (2) there is an uncertain and variable clinical pathway, (3) the nuance of investigations, (4) these conditions were difficult to therapeutically manage, and (5) there are barriers to developing a therapeutic relationship. ConclusionsFindings indicate that both patients and clinicians are dissatisfied with the current clinical care pathways for nausea and vomiting syndromes and functional dyspepsia. Recommendations included the development of more clinically relevant and discriminant tests, standardization of the diagnostic journey, and the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
6
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%