RapiD_AI: A framework for Rapidly Deployable AI for novel disease & pandemic preparedness
Youssef, A.; Zhu, T.; Thakur, A.; Watkinson, P.; Horby, P.; W Eyre, D.; A Clifton, D.
Show abstract
COVID-19 is unlikely to be the last pandemic that we face. According to an analysis of a global dataset of historical pandemics from 1600 to the present, the risk of a COVID-like pandemic has been estimated as 2.63% annually or a 38% lifetime probability. This rate may double over the coming decades. While we may be unable to prevent future pandemics, we can reduce their impact by investing in preparedness. In this study, we propose RapiD_AI : a framework to guide the use of pretrained neural network models as a pandemic preparedness tool to enable healthcare system resilience and effective use of ML during future pandemics. The RapiD_AI framework allows us to build high-performing ML models using data collected in the first weeks of the pandemic and provides an approach to adapt the models to the local populations and healthcare needs. The motivation is to enable healthcare systems to overcome data limitations that prevent the development of effective ML in the context of novel diseases. We digitally recreated the first 20 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic and experimentally demonstrated the RapiD_AI framework using domain adaptation and inductive transfer. We (i) pretrain two neural network models (Deep Neural Network and TabNet) on a large Electronic Health Records dataset representative of a general in-patient population in Oxford, UK, (ii) fine-tune using data from the first weeks of the pandemic, and (iii) simulate local deployment by testing the performance of the models on a held-out test dataset of COVID-19 patients. Our approach has demonstrated an average relative/absolute gain of 4.92/4.21% AUC compared to an XGBoost benchmark model trained on COVID-19 data only. Moreover, we show our ability to identify the most useful historical pretraining samples through clustering and to expand the task of deployed models through inductive transfer to meet the emerging needs of a healthcare system without access to large historical pretraining datasets.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 96%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 96%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Explanations from AI Algorithms for Clinical Decision-Making: A Social Science-based Approach 96%
- A Transformer-Based Model Trained on Large Scale Claims Data for Prediction of Severe COVID-19 Disease Progression 95%
- pathCLIP: Detection of Genes and Gene Relations from Biological Pathway Figures through Image-Text Contrastive Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 96%
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 93%
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.