Back

Anakinra in hospitalized COVID-19 patients guided by baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a real world, retrospective cohort study

Segala, F. V.; Rando, E.; Salvati, F.; Negri, M.; Catania, F.; Sanmartin, F.; Murri, R.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J.; Fantoni, M.

2022-08-10 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.08.05.22278477 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn patients with COVID-19 and baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma (suPAR) levels [&ge;] 6ng/mL, early administration of anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, may prevent disease progression and death. In case of suPAR testing unavailability, the Severe COvid Prediction Estimate (SCOPE) score may be used as an alternative in guiding treatment decisions. MethodsWe conducted a monocenter, retrospective cohort study, including patients with SARS-CoV2 infection and respiratory failure. Patients treated with anakinra (anakinra group, AG) were compared to two control groups of patients who did not receive anakinra, respectively with [&ge;] 6 ng/mL (CG1) and < 6 ng/mL (CG2) baseline suPAR levels. Controls were paired by age, sex, date of admission and vaccination status. Primary endpoint of the study was disease progression at day 14 from admission, as defined by patient distribution on a simplified version of the 11-point World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS). ResultsBetween July, 2021 and January, 2022, 153 patients were included, among which 56 were treated with off-label anakinra, 49 retrospectively fulfilled prescriptive criteria for anakinra and were assigned to CG1, and 48 presented with suPAR levels < 6ng/mL and were assigned to CG2. At day 14, when comparing to CG1, patients who received anakinra had significantly reduced odds of progressing towards worse clinical outcome both in ordinal regression analysis (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.54, p<0.001) and in multivariable analysis (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.03-0.82, p=0.037), and these results were confirmed even when controlling for age, sex, BMI and vaccinal status. Sensitivities of baseline suPAR and SCOPE score in predicting progression towards severe disease or death at day 14 were similar (83% vs 100%, p=0.59). ConclusionThis real-word, retrospective cohort study confirmed the safety and the efficacy of suPAR-guided, early use of anakinra in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.6%
2
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
4
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%