Anakinra in hospitalized COVID-19 patients guided by baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: a real world, retrospective cohort study
Segala, F. V.; Rando, E.; Salvati, F.; Negri, M.; Catania, F.; Sanmartin, F.; Murri, R.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J.; Fantoni, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn patients with COVID-19 and baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma (suPAR) levels [≥] 6ng/mL, early administration of anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, may prevent disease progression and death. In case of suPAR testing unavailability, the Severe COvid Prediction Estimate (SCOPE) score may be used as an alternative in guiding treatment decisions. MethodsWe conducted a monocenter, retrospective cohort study, including patients with SARS-CoV2 infection and respiratory failure. Patients treated with anakinra (anakinra group, AG) were compared to two control groups of patients who did not receive anakinra, respectively with [≥] 6 ng/mL (CG1) and < 6 ng/mL (CG2) baseline suPAR levels. Controls were paired by age, sex, date of admission and vaccination status. Primary endpoint of the study was disease progression at day 14 from admission, as defined by patient distribution on a simplified version of the 11-point World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS). ResultsBetween July, 2021 and January, 2022, 153 patients were included, among which 56 were treated with off-label anakinra, 49 retrospectively fulfilled prescriptive criteria for anakinra and were assigned to CG1, and 48 presented with suPAR levels < 6ng/mL and were assigned to CG2. At day 14, when comparing to CG1, patients who received anakinra had significantly reduced odds of progressing towards worse clinical outcome both in ordinal regression analysis (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.54, p<0.001) and in multivariable analysis (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.03-0.82, p=0.037), and these results were confirmed even when controlling for age, sex, BMI and vaccinal status. Sensitivities of baseline suPAR and SCOPE score in predicting progression towards severe disease or death at day 14 were similar (83% vs 100%, p=0.59). ConclusionThis real-word, retrospective cohort study confirmed the safety and the efficacy of suPAR-guided, early use of anakinra in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Novel prognostic determinants of COVID-19-related mortality: a pilot study on severely-ill patients in Russia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ruxolitinib versus Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19: multicenter matched-controlled study 96%
- Efficacy of Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in reducing the risk of severe outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-life full-matched case-control study (SAVALO Study) 94%
- Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients during B.1.1.529 (Omicron) dominance compared to B.1.617.2 (Delta) in 89 German hospitals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination Of Tocilizumab And Steroids To Improve Mortality In Patients With Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Spanish, Multicenter, Cohort Study 94%
- The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID19 patients : a multicenter national retrospective cohort 94%
- Early transfusion of convalescent plasma improves the clinical outcome in severe SARS-CoV2 infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: toward a differential profiling of patients with severe outcome 95%
- Exposing Limitations of Clinical Laboratory Tests in COVID-19 and the Promise of Immunological Biomarkers 94%
- Circulatory Cytokines and Chemokines Profile in Human Coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tocilizumab versus baricitinib in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19: an open label, randomized controlled trial 94%
- Impact of vaccination on the presence and severity of symptoms of hospitalised patients with an infection by the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of the SARS-CoV-2 (subvariant BA.1) 93%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.