Back

Gene expression levels of the glycolytic enzymes lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and phosphofructokinase platelet (PFKP) are good predictors of survival time, recurrence and risk of death in cervical cancer.

Bolanos-Suarez, V.; Alfaro, A.; Espinosa, A. M.; Medina-Martinez, I.; Juarez, E.; Villegas-Sepulveda, N.; Gudino-Zayas, M.; Gutierrez-Castro, A.; Roman-Bassaure, E.; Salinas-Nieve, M. E.; Bruno-Munoz, S.; Flores-Herrera, O.; Berumen, J.

2022-08-03 oncology
10.1101/2022.08.02.22277946 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUp to 74% of patients with cervical cancer (CC) may experience recurrence after their treatment, and most of them are identified late when only the clinical parameters are used, which decreases their chances of recovery. Molecular markers can improve the prediction of clinical outcome and identify therapeutic targets in CC. Glycolysis is altered in 70% of CCs, so it could be a metabolic pathway in which molecular markers associated with the aggressiveness of CC can be identified. MethodsThe expression of 14 glycolytic genes was analyzed in 118 CC samples by microarrays, and only LDHA and PFKP were validated by qRT-PCR (n=58) and in second and third replicates by Western blotting (n=69) and immunohistochemistry (n=18). ResultsLDHA and PFKP were associated with poor overall survival [OS: LDHA HR=3.0 (95% CI= 1.1-8.2); p=2.9 x 10-2; PFKP HR=3.4 (95% CI= 1.1-10.5); p= 3.5 x 10-2] and disease-free survival [DFS: LDHA HR=2.7 (95% CI= 1.6-6.3); p=2.6 x 10-2] independent of FIGO clinical stage. The risk of death was greater when both biomarkers were overexpressed than when using only FIGO stage [HR =7 (95% CI 1.6-31.1, p=1.0 x 10-2) versus HR=8.1 (95% CI=2.6-26.1; p=4.3 x 10-4)] and increased exponentially as the expression of LDHA and PFKP increased. ConclusionsLDHA and PFKP at the mRNA and protein levels were associated with poor overall survival, disease-free survival and increased risk of death of patients with CC regardless of FIGO stage. The measurement of expression of these two markers could be very useful to evaluate the clinical evolution and the risk of death from CC and to make better therapeutic decisions at the beginning of treatment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
13
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
15
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
25
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%