Mercury exposure and health risks associated with use of skin-lightening products: A systematic review
Bastiansz, A.; Ewald, J.; Rodriguez Saldana, V.; Santa Rios, A.; Basu, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Minamata Convention on Mercury (Article 4) prohibits the manufacture, import or export of skin-lightening products containing mercury concentrations above 1 g/g. However, there is a lack of knowledge surrounding the global prevalence of mercury-added skin-lightening products. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to increase our understanding of worldwide human mercury exposure and associated health risks from the use of skin-lightening products. MethodsA systematic search of peer-reviewed scientific literature was performed in four databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Toxline). The initial search in July of 2018 identified 1,711 unique scientific articles, of which 34 were ultimately deemed eligible for inclusion after iterative screens at the title, abstract, and whole text levels. A second search was performed in November of 2020 using the same methods, of which another 7 scientific articles were included. All papers were organized according to four data groups 1) "Mercury in products", 2) "Usage of products", 3) "Human biomarkers of exposure"; and 4) "Health impacts", prior to data extraction and synthesis. ResultsThis review was based on data contained within 41 peer-reviewed scientific papers from 22 countries worldwide published between 2000 and 2020. In total, we captured mercury concentration values from 787 skin-lightening product samples (overall pooled central median mercury level was 0.49 g/g, IQR: 0.02 - 5.9) and 1,042 human biomarker measurements from 863 individuals. We also synthesized usage information from 3,898 individuals, and self-reported health impacts associated with using mercury-added products from 832 individuals. DiscussionThis review suggests that mercury widely exists as an active ingredient in many skin-lightening products worldwide, and that users are at risk of variable, and often high exposures. These synthesized findings help increase our understanding of the health risks associated with the use of these products.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal assessment of mycotoxin co-exposures in exclusively breastfed infants 95%
- A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014 95%
- Insights into the early-life chemical exposome of Nigerian infants and potential correlations with the developing gut microbiome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging integrative toxicogenomic approach towards development of stressor-centric adverse outcome pathway networks for plastic additives 95%
- Tat_BioV: Tattoo ink exposure and biokinetics of selected tracers in a short-term quasi-experimental clinical study of 24 subjects 94%
- Identification of Functional Genetic Components Modulating Toxicity Response to PFOS using Genome-wide CRISPR Screens in HepG2/C3A cells 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Do improved biomass cookstove interventions improve indoor air quality and blood pressure? A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Phthalates, Bisphenols, and Childhood Allergic Phenotypes: Findings from Two Birth Cohort Studies 91%
- Response of Wastewater-Based Epidemiology Predictor for the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Ahmedabad, India: A Long-term Data Perspective 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A pilot biomonitoring study of cumulative phthalates exposure among Vietnamese American nail salon workers 96%
- Case fatality as an indicator for the human toxicity of pesticides - a systematic review on the availability and variability of severity indicators of pesticide poisoning 95%
- Factors affecting zero-waste behaviors: Focusing on the health effects of microplastics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.