Automated container-less cell processing method for single-cell proteomics
Matsumoto, C.; Shao, X.; Bogosavljevic, M.; Chen, L.; Gao, Y.
Show abstract
Single-cell genomics and transcriptomics studies enabled us to characterize cell heterogeneity in various tissues, which helped us to better understand the biological system and disease progression. Single-cell proteomics, which directly measures the protein expression level, has the potential to further enhance our knowledge by providing not only a more direct measurement but also crucial information cannot be captured by genomics or transcriptomics study, such as protein activation states and post-translation modification events. One of the main challenges of single-cell proteomics is the large sample loss during sample preparation, which is largely unavoidable using standard proteomics protocols. Protein and peptide loss to the container surface is a well-known phenomenon but often overlooked in larger-scale (>1 {micro}g) proteomics experiments. When it comes to single-cell proteomics with only picograms of protein samples, this loss becomes non-negligible and often dictates the outcomes of the experiment. More importantly, sample processing through multiple pipette tips and containers often introduces random errors, which undermine the ability to detect true heterogenous cellular events. To solve these problems and further improve the throughput and reproducibility of the single-cell proteomics experiments, we developed an automated container-less cell processing platform, utilizing acoustic levitation to process cell samples in the air. Our platform automatically performs cell lysis, protein reduction, alkylation, digestion, and peptide labeling in the air, without any sample transfer step or container. The digested and labeled peptides are then directly injected into the capillary LC-MS/MS system for analysis, eliminating manual steps and conserving most of the sample materials for proteomics analysis. Our initial test shows at least 30% improvement in peptide signals over conventional methods. This process can be performed in parallel to further improve sample processing throughput.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High sensitivity limited material proteomics empowered by data-independent acquisition on linear ion traps 97%
- Metabolomic, proteomic and single cell proteomic analysis of cancer cells treated with the KRASG12D inhibitor MRTX1133 97%
- Optimized Time-segmented Acquisition Expands Peptide and Protein Identification in TIMS-TOF Pro Mass Spectrometry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmented MS/MS acquisition of a1 ion-based strategy for in-depth proteome quantitation 95%
- Native Triboelectric Nanogenerator Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry of Egg Proteins Relevant to Objects of Cultural Heritage at Picoliter and Nanomolar Quantities. 95%
- SPPUSM: An MS/MS spectra merging strategy for improved low-input and single-cell proteome identification 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Profiling embryonic stem cell differentiation by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry: development of a reproducible and robust sample preparation workflow 95%
- A rapid and universal liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry-based platform, refmAb-Q nSMOL, for monitoring monoclonal antibody therapeutics 94%
- A combined flow injection/reversed phase chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry workflow for accurate absolute lipid quantification with 13C- internal standards 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A single protein to multiple peptides: Investigation of protein-peptide relationship using targeted alpha-2-macroglobulin analysis 96%
- A generic normalization method for proper quantification in untargeted proteomics screening 93%
- A Facile and Rapid Route to Self-Digitization of Samples into a High Density Microwell Array for Digital Bioassays 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.